Find a district › Fairbanks Local

Fairbanks Local

What its pupils achieve, and how little of it the funding side explains.

Against districts with comparable poverty

This district
100.0
A district's tested students distributed across Ohio's achievement levels, weighted so higher levels count for more. It tracks the economically disadvantaged share at −0.85, so most of what it appears to say about a district is poverty. Performance Index →, 2024-25
Median of its poverty fifth
100.3
121 districts in the least poor fifth, 2%–31% economically disadvantaged
Difference
−0.3
points, against like-composed districts

Fairbanks Local scores 0.3 points below the median of its poverty fifth: 100.0 against 100.3. Every district in that fifth, by Performance Index — the shaded box is its middle half, and the rule marked Fairbanks Local is this district. The gap in the third tile is worth what the width of this box says it is worth.

Performance Index 100.0 48th percentile of its fifth
85110Fairbanks LocalFifth's median 100.3Ohio median 88.3
85110Fairbanks LocalFifth's median 100.3Ohio median 88.3
85110Fairbanks LocalFifth's median 100.3Ohio median 88.3
The values
  • Cardinal Local: Performance Index 83.8, 29% economically disadvantaged
  • Tiffin City: Performance Index 83.9, 6% economically disadvantaged
  • North Central Local: Performance Index 84.0, 13% economically disadvantaged
  • Waynesfield-Goshen Local: Performance Index 89.8, 17% economically disadvantaged
  • Mogadore Local: Performance Index 90.7, 24% economically disadvantaged
  • Otsego Local: Performance Index 90.8, 25% economically disadvantaged
  • North Ridgeville City: Performance Index 91.5, 29% economically disadvantaged
  • Centerburg Local: Performance Index 91.9, 29% economically disadvantaged
  • Pike-Delta-York Local: Performance Index 92.6, 22% economically disadvantaged
  • Little Miami Local: Performance Index 92.6, 27% economically disadvantaged
  • Bloom-Carroll Local: Performance Index 93.4, 24% economically disadvantaged
  • Brunswick City: Performance Index 93.5, 30% economically disadvantaged
  • Olmsted Falls City: Performance Index 93.7, 27% economically disadvantaged
  • Jennings Local: Performance Index 94.2, 16% economically disadvantaged
  • Perry Local: Performance Index 94.2, 26% economically disadvantaged
  • Johnstown-Monroe Local: Performance Index 94.5, 28% economically disadvantaged
  • Northeastern Local: Performance Index 94.6, 28% economically disadvantaged
  • St Clairsville-Richland City: Performance Index 94.8, 26% economically disadvantaged
  • Pandora-Gilboa Local: Performance Index 94.9, 30% economically disadvantaged
  • Lexington Local: Performance Index 94.9, 31% economically disadvantaged
  • Big Walnut Local: Performance Index 95.1, 20% economically disadvantaged
  • New Riegel Local: Performance Index 95.3, 24% economically disadvantaged
  • Pettisville Local: Performance Index 95.3, 26% economically disadvantaged
  • Monroe Local: Performance Index 95.3, 28% economically disadvantaged
  • Marysville Exempted Village: Performance Index 95.5, 26% economically disadvantaged
  • Jonathan Alder Local: Performance Index 95.9, 26% economically disadvantaged
  • Fairlawn Local: Performance Index 96.0, 30% economically disadvantaged
  • Wadsworth City: Performance Index 96.4, 31% economically disadvantaged
  • Medina City SD: Performance Index 96.5, 26% economically disadvantaged
  • Centerville City: Performance Index 96.6, 24% economically disadvantaged
  • Van Buren Local: Performance Index 96.7, 22% economically disadvantaged
  • Buckeye Local: Performance Index 96.7, 24% economically disadvantaged
  • Twinsburg City: Performance Index 96.9, 27% economically disadvantaged
  • Milford Exempted Village: Performance Index 97.0, 26% economically disadvantaged
  • Poland Local: Performance Index 97.1, 23% economically disadvantaged
  • Arlington Local: Performance Index 97.1, 28% economically disadvantaged
  • Ayersville Local: Performance Index 97.2, 17% economically disadvantaged
  • Kings Local: Performance Index 97.4, 26% economically disadvantaged
  • Dublin City: Performance Index 97.6, 22% economically disadvantaged
  • Buckeye Valley Local: Performance Index 97.7, 24% economically disadvantaged
  • Ottawa-Glandorf Local: Performance Index 97.8, 17% economically disadvantaged
  • Beavercreek City: Performance Index 98.1, 21% economically disadvantaged
  • West Liberty-Salem Local: Performance Index 98.4, 28% economically disadvantaged
  • Copley-Fairlawn City: Performance Index 98.5, 26% economically disadvantaged
  • Lakeview Local: Performance Index 98.5, 30% economically disadvantaged
  • Tuslaw Local: Performance Index 98.5, 30% economically disadvantaged
  • Nordonia Hills City: Performance Index 98.8, 17% economically disadvantaged
  • Eastwood Local: Performance Index 98.8, 31% economically disadvantaged
  • North Royalton City: Performance Index 99.0, 18% economically disadvantaged
  • Green Local: Performance Index 99.0, 21% economically disadvantaged
  • Miami East Local: Performance Index 99.1, 13% economically disadvantaged
  • East Holmes Local: Performance Index 99.1, 21% economically disadvantaged
  • Archbold-Area Local: Performance Index 99.1, 27% economically disadvantaged
  • Springboro Community City: Performance Index 99.2, 14% economically disadvantaged
  • Strongsville City: Performance Index 99.3, 23% economically disadvantaged
  • Tipp City Exempted Village: Performance Index 99.4, 15% economically disadvantaged
  • Cedar Cliff Local: Performance Index 99.4, 24% economically disadvantaged
  • Newton Local: Performance Index 99.7, 27% economically disadvantaged
  • Fairbanks Local: Performance Index 100.0, 18% economically disadvantaged
  • Liberty-Benton Local: Performance Index 100.1, 24% economically disadvantaged
  • Jackson Local: Performance Index 100.3, 20% economically disadvantaged
  • Westlake City: Performance Index 100.7, 22% economically disadvantaged
  • North Canton City: Performance Index 100.8, 29% economically disadvantaged
  • Coldwater Exempted Village: Performance Index 101.2, 18% economically disadvantaged
  • Bluffton Exempted Village: Performance Index 101.2, 24% economically disadvantaged
  • Liberty Center Local: Performance Index 101.3, 28% economically disadvantaged
  • Loveland City: Performance Index 101.9, 19% economically disadvantaged
  • Chardon Local: Performance Index 101.9, 22% economically disadvantaged
  • Lake Local: Performance Index 101.9, 23% economically disadvantaged
  • Avon Lake City: Performance Index 102.0, 14% economically disadvantaged
  • South Range Local: Performance Index 102.0, 29% economically disadvantaged
  • Anna Local: Performance Index 102.1, 20% economically disadvantaged
  • Botkins Local: Performance Index 102.3, 20% economically disadvantaged
  • Independence Local: Performance Index 102.6, 15% economically disadvantaged
  • Bexley City: Performance Index 102.7, 13% economically disadvantaged
  • Ottoville Local: Performance Index 102.8, 10% economically disadvantaged
  • Forest Hills Local: Performance Index 102.8, 19% economically disadvantaged
  • Wayne Local: Performance Index 102.9, 19% economically disadvantaged
  • Bellbrook-Sugarcreek Local: Performance Index 103.0, 19% economically disadvantaged
  • New Knoxville Local: Performance Index 103.0, 21% economically disadvantaged
  • Kirtland Local: Performance Index 103.2, 15% economically disadvantaged
  • Kalida Local: Performance Index 103.3, 8% economically disadvantaged
  • Fort Recovery Local: Performance Index 103.3, 12% economically disadvantaged
  • Mason City: Performance Index 103.4, 19% economically disadvantaged
  • Perrysburg Exempted Village: Performance Index 103.5, 13% economically disadvantaged
  • Upper Arlington City: Performance Index 103.6, 7% economically disadvantaged
  • Kenston Local: Performance Index 103.8, 13% economically disadvantaged
  • Avon Local: Performance Index 103.8, 14% economically disadvantaged
  • Olentangy Local: Performance Index 103.9, 12% economically disadvantaged
  • Canfield Local: Performance Index 103.9, 18% economically disadvantaged
  • Sycamore Community City: Performance Index 104.1, 18% economically disadvantaged
  • Anthony Wayne Local: Performance Index 104.2, 17% economically disadvantaged
  • Indian Hill Exempted Village: Performance Index 104.3, 8% economically disadvantaged
  • Aurora City: Performance Index 104.5, 11% economically disadvantaged
  • New Albany-Plain Local: Performance Index 105.1, 16% economically disadvantaged
  • Grandview Heights Schools: Performance Index 106.0, 8% economically disadvantaged
  • Revere Local: Performance Index 106.1, 10% economically disadvantaged
  • Beachwood City: Performance Index 106.3, 23% economically disadvantaged
  • Granville Exempted Village: Performance Index 106.4, 8% economically disadvantaged
  • Brecksville-Broadview Heights City: Performance Index 106.4, 17% economically disadvantaged
  • Highland Local: Performance Index 106.6, 11% economically disadvantaged
  • Orange City: Performance Index 106.8, 12% economically disadvantaged
  • Wyoming City: Performance Index 106.9, 13% economically disadvantaged
  • Hudson City: Performance Index 107.1, 8% economically disadvantaged
  • New Bremen Local: Performance Index 107.7, 14% economically disadvantaged
  • Bay Village City: Performance Index 107.9, 10% economically disadvantaged
  • Oakwood City: Performance Index 108.0, 7% economically disadvantaged
  • Miller City-New Cleveland Local: Performance Index 108.1, 12% economically disadvantaged
  • Fort Loramie Local: Performance Index 108.2, 9% economically disadvantaged
  • St Henry Consolidated Local: Performance Index 108.3, 10% economically disadvantaged
  • West Geauga Local: Performance Index 108.5, 17% economically disadvantaged
  • Madeira City: Performance Index 108.6, 9% economically disadvantaged
  • Minster Local: Performance Index 109.0, 13% economically disadvantaged
  • Ottawa Hills Local: Performance Index 109.2, 2% economically disadvantaged
  • Versailles Exempted Village: Performance Index 109.3, 16% economically disadvantaged
  • Russia Local: Performance Index 109.7, 12% economically disadvantaged
  • Mariemont City: Performance Index 110.1, 13% economically disadvantaged
  • Chagrin Falls Exempted Village: Performance Index 111.0, 7% economically disadvantaged
  • Rocky River City: Performance Index 111.1, 14% economically disadvantaged
  • Marion Local: Performance Index 111.7, 3% economically disadvantaged
  • Solon City: Performance Index 112.8, 18% economically disadvantaged

Ohio's attainment measure tracks economic disadvantage at −0.846 statewide, so comparing this district to the state median would mostly be comparing its poverty rate to the state's. The middle tile is the comparison worth making, and the difference between them is what is left after one crude control.

It is not an effect of anything. Districts are not assigned to a poverty fifth at random, the fifths are wide, and a single year of a measure that barely moves cannot separate a school's contribution from its intake. See what this data can and cannot say.

Outcomes

Performance Index, 2022-2398.1
Performance Index, 2023-2499.1
Performance Index, 2024-25100.0
Progress, three-year average
The department's headline growth measure, and the one every correlation on this site uses.
 0.02
Progress, one year
The same measure without the smoothing, also published.
 0.00
Operating spending per enrolled pupil $16,373
Operating spending per need-weighted pupil $14,022
Economically disadvantaged (report card) 17.0%
English learners —
Students with disabilities 13.8%

The Performance Index is close to a fixed district trait across these three years, which is why a change in funding is unlikely to show up in it. Progress is the measure that moves. Both are 2024-25; the spending figures are FY2025.

One of the two growth measures prints 0.00 over one year, which at two decimals covers anything within half a hundredth of zero and has no direction to read. Statewide the two correlate at 0.90, and of the 534 districts printing a non-zero value on both, 44 point opposite ways — none of them with both magnitudes above 0.05.

The two economically-disadvantaged shares on this page differ: the report card's is top-coded by community eligibility, the profile report's (18.4%) is not.

Two mistakes this page is built to prevent

Reading a correlation with poverty as a correlation with something elseEconomic disadvantage explains Ohio's attainment measure at −0.846. Most other district-level variables are that one in disguise — including, sharply, guarantee status. Every association statewide, with its controlled figure beside it.
Quoting a per-pupil number without its denominatorThe two spending figures above share a numerator. The department's divides by a need-weighted count; the other divides by headcount. Against an outcome that is itself composition-driven, the first is substantially a composition proxy — statewide the same numerator gives −0.004 one way and −0.355 the other.

Nothing on this page is causal, and nothing on it is a judgment about this district's schools. What it funds is on the dashboard; what it actually collected and spent is in its finances.