Find a district › Maysville Local

Maysville Local

What moved this district's funding from FY2025 to FY2027, line by line — on total state support, and on the foundation aid this site models — and where it sits among its county's districts.

Across Muskingum County Contents

FY2026 and FY2027 models, nominal dollars

On total state support, Maysville Local moved +3.8% (+$627,469) from FY2026 to FY2027: the largest rise of 6 in Muskingum County.

Tri-Valley LocalFranklin LocalZanesville CityWest MuskingumLocalEast MuskingumLocalMaysville Local+3.8%−7.7%
Tri-Valley LocalFranklin LocalZanesville CityWest Muskingum LocalEast Muskingum LocalMaysville Local+3.8%−7.7%
Tri-Valley LocalFranklin LocalZanesville CityWest Muskingum LocalEast Muskingum LocalMaysville Local+3.8%−7.7%
The values
  • Maysville Local: +3.8% (+$627,469) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Tri-Valley Local: +0.7% (+$125,968) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Franklin Local: +0.2% (+$23,673) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Zanesville City: −1.6% (−$480,662) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • West Muskingum Local: −6.8% (−$427,239) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • East Muskingum Local: −7.7% (−$1,010,678) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027

On foundation aid, Maysville Local moved +3.9% (+$598,973) from FY2026 to FY2027: the largest rise of 6 in Muskingum County.

Tri-Valley LocalFranklin LocalZanesville CityEast MuskingumLocalWest MuskingumLocalMaysville Local+3.9%−12.3%
Tri-Valley LocalFranklin LocalZanesville CityEast Muskingum LocalWest Muskingum LocalMaysville Local+3.9%−12.3%
Tri-Valley LocalFranklin LocalZanesville CityEast Muskingum LocalWest Muskingum LocalMaysville Local+3.9%−12.3%
The values
  • Maysville Local: +3.9% (+$598,973) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Tri-Valley Local: 0.0% ($0) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Franklin Local: −0.2% (−$19,888) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Zanesville City: −1.7% (−$484,187) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • East Muskingum Local: −9.7% (−$1,082,162) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • West Muskingum Local: −12.3% (−$531,028) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027

Every district the department attributes to Muskingum County, as a percentage of its own FY2026 figure, so a city and a village can be read on one scale. The two measures can rank the same county in different orders: a district held at its base does not move on foundation aid at all, whatever its other lines do.

By line Contents

Every line the department pays this district through, in the three years. Total state support, the last row, is all of them; foundation aid, the first, is the narrow measure — core foundation funding and the guarantee, the part this site models. FY2025 is the department's final payment report; FY2026 and FY2027 are its models of those years, not payments. Every figure is in nominal dollars.

Line FY2025 paidFY2026 modelFY2027 model FY2026 to FY2027
Foundation aid (the narrow measure)$15,426,692$15,184,364$15,783,337+$598,973
Transportation$1,227,382$1,224,935$1,243,933+$18,998
Special education transportation$91,309$107,313$94,632−$12,681
Preschool special education$157,899$166,383$163,523−$2,860
Supplemental targeted assistance (repealed by H.B. 96)$0$0$0$0
Formula transition supplement$0$0$0$0
Base funding supplement$0$46,217$71,255+$25,039
Enrollment growth supplement$0$0$0$0
Performance supplement$0$0$0$0
Total state support (the wide measure)$16,903,281$16,729,212$17,356,681+$627,469

The lines sum to total state support in every year, to within cent rounding. Supplemental targeted assistance keeps its row after FY2025 because its going is part of the change: H.B. 96 repealed it, and the base funding and enrollment growth supplements it created are separate lines, not its replacement under another name.

The phase-in Contents

Foundation aid is paid as the funding base plus the The share of the gap between what the formula computes and a district's older base that is actually paid. A district below its base is held at the base, so a higher phase-in does not reach it.'s share of the gap between what the formula calculates and that base, and the guarantee holds it up where the result would fall. These are the department's own three figures for each year. FY2025 is the department's final payment report; FY2026 and FY2027 are its models of those years, not payments. Every figure is in nominal dollars.

Stage FY2025 paidFY2026 modelFY2027 model
Funding base$13,742,347$13,742,347$13,742,347
Calculated by the formula$16,268,737$15,472,837$15,783,337
Paid through the phase-in$15,426,692$15,184,364$15,783,337
Guarantee$0$0$0
Foundation aid$15,426,692$15,184,364$15,783,337
  • FY2025: +$1,684,344 above its base. The formula calculates $16,268,737, $2,526,390 over a $13,742,347 base, and the phase-in pays $1,684,344 of that gap.
  • FY2026: +$1,442,017 above its base. The formula calculates $15,472,837, $1,730,489 over a $13,742,347 base, and the phase-in pays $1,442,017 of that gap.
  • FY2027: +$2,040,990 above its base. The formula calculates $15,783,337, $2,040,990 over a $13,742,347 base, and the phase-in pays $2,040,990 of that gap.

The phase-in statewide counts the districts paid exactly their base in each year, which a higher rate does not reach, and what it paid above everyone else's.

What moved underneath Contents

Three inputs and the measure each reaches the dollars through. The files publish the inputs and the payment but not how much of the payment's change each input is, so nothing here divides the change between them. The FY2025 payment report carries no capacity inputs at all, so state share and enrollment start at FY2026. Dollar figures are in nominal dollars.

  • State share went from 64.5% in FY2026 to 62.5% in FY2027. It is the part of base cost the state pays after the district's local capacity is charged, so it reaches the dollars through foundation aid, which moved +$598,973 over the same two years. Reappraisal and the state share sets the fall beside every district's valuation change, by the share it started at.
  • Assessed valuation went from $234,664,660 in tax year 2023 to $321,874,670 in tax year 2025 (+37.2%). Valuation is the larger part of local capacity, which is what sets the state share above — the route by which a reappraisal reaches foundation aid at all.
  • Enrolled ADM went from 1,711.7 in FY2026 to 1,781.4 in FY2027, as each year's file states it (+4.1%). Base cost is computed per pupil, so enrollment reaches the dollars through the formula's calculated figure on the phase-in card.

Transfers and net funding Contents

What the department deducts from total state support before it pays the district — the educational service center's charge and other adjustments — and what is left. FY2025's report publishes the transfers as one total; FY2027's itemizes them; FY2026's publishes none, and that column says so rather than showing a zero. FY2025 is the department's final payment report; FY2026 and FY2027 are its models of those years, not payments. Every figure is in nominal dollars.

FY2025 paidFY2026 modelFY2027 model
Total state support$16,903,281$16,729,212$17,356,681
Service center chargenot itemizednot published−$1,398,750
Other adjustmentsnot itemizednot published−$127,343
Transfers, in total−$1,723,033not published−$1,526,094
Net state funding$15,180,248not published$15,830,588