Find a district › Jackson-Milton Local

Jackson-Milton Local

What moved this district's funding from FY2025 to FY2027, line by line — on total state support, and on the foundation aid this site models — and where it sits among its county's districts.

Across Mahoning County Contents

FY2026 and FY2027 models, nominal dollars

On total state support, Jackson-Milton Local moved +1.1% (+$31,624) from FY2026 to FY2027: the 6th-largest rise of 14 in Mahoning County.

Poland LocalLowellville LocalStruthers CityCanfield LocalWestern ReserveLocalYoungstown CitySpringfield LocalSouth Range LocalSebring LocalWest Branch LocalCampbell CityAustintown LocalSchoolsBoardman LocalJackson-MiltonLocal+2.3%+1.1%−21.1%
Poland LocalLowellville LocalStruthers CityCanfield LocalWestern Reserve LocalYoungstown CitySpringfield LocalSouth Range LocalSebring LocalWest Branch LocalCampbell CityAustintown Local SchoolsBoardman LocalJackson-Milton Local+2.3%+1.1%−21.1%
Poland LocalLowellville LocalStruthers CityCanfield LocalWestern Reserve LocalYoungstown CitySpringfield LocalSouth Range LocalSebring LocalWest Branch LocalCampbell CityAustintown Local SchoolsBoardman LocalJackson-Milton Local+2.3%+1.1%−21.1%
The values
  • Poland Local: +2.3% (+$119,245) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Lowellville Local: +2.3% (+$108,669) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Struthers City: +1.9% (+$311,538) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Canfield Local: +1.6% (+$94,354) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Western Reserve Local: +1.3% (+$48,689) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Jackson-Milton Local: +1.1% (+$31,624) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Youngstown City: +0.9% (+$565,971) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Springfield Local: +0.7% (+$28,410) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • South Range Local: +0.6% (+$34,601) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Sebring Local: +0.4% (+$18,825) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • West Branch Local: 0.0% (−$2,155) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Campbell City: −0.6% (−$87,420) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Austintown Local Schools: −3.2% (−$878,689) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Boardman Local: −21.1% (−$2,056,676) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027

On foundation aid, Jackson-Milton Local moved 0.0% ($0) from FY2026 to FY2027: one of 6 of 14 in Mahoning County that did not move.

Lowellville LocalStruthers CityWestern ReserveLocalYoungstown CityCanfield LocalPoland LocalSouth Range LocalSpringfield LocalSebring LocalCampbell CityWest Branch LocalAustintown LocalSchoolsBoardman LocalJackson-MiltonLocal+2.5%0.0%−28.1%
Lowellville LocalStruthers CityWestern Reserve LocalYoungstown CityCanfield LocalPoland LocalSouth Range LocalSpringfield LocalSebring LocalCampbell CityWest Branch LocalAustintown Local SchoolsBoardman LocalJackson-Milton Local+2.5%0.0%−28.1%
Lowellville LocalStruthers CityWestern Reserve LocalYoungstown CityCanfield LocalPoland LocalSouth Range LocalSpringfield LocalSebring LocalCampbell CityWest Branch LocalAustintown Local SchoolsBoardman LocalJackson-Milton Local+2.5%0.0%−28.1%
The values
  • Lowellville Local: +2.5% (+$114,075) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Struthers City: +1.8% (+$286,311) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Western Reserve Local: +0.7% (+$24,794) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Youngstown City: 0.0% ($0) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Canfield Local: 0.0% ($0) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Jackson-Milton Local: 0.0% ($0) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Poland Local: 0.0% ($0) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • South Range Local: 0.0% ($0) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Springfield Local: 0.0% ($0) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Sebring Local: −0.3% (−$15,915) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Campbell City: −0.9% (−$118,288) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • West Branch Local: −1.0% (−$113,043) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Austintown Local Schools: −3.8% (−$976,276) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Boardman Local: −28.1% (−$2,139,342) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027

Every district the department attributes to Mahoning County, as a percentage of its own FY2026 figure, so a city and a village can be read on one scale. The two measures can rank the same county in different orders: a district held at its base does not move on foundation aid at all, whatever its other lines do.

By line Contents

Every line the department pays this district through, in the three years. Total state support, the last row, is all of them; foundation aid, the first, is the narrow measure — core foundation funding and the guarantee, the part this site models. FY2025 is the department's final payment report; FY2026 and FY2027 are its models of those years, not payments. Every figure is in nominal dollars.

Line FY2025 paidFY2026 modelFY2027 model FY2026 to FY2027
Foundation aid (the narrow measure)$2,347,574$2,249,752$2,249,752$0
Transportation$433,894$493,557$516,805+$23,248
Special education transportation$18,524$25,249$25,561+$311
Preschool special education$39,818$40,770$40,378−$392
Supplemental targeted assistance (repealed by H.B. 96)$0$0$0$0
Formula transition supplement$0$0$0$0
Base funding supplement$0$20,751$30,075+$9,324
Enrollment growth supplement$0$0$0$0
Performance supplement$0$39,965$39,098−$867
Total state support (the wide measure)$2,839,810$2,870,044$2,901,669+$31,624

The lines sum to total state support in every year, to within cent rounding. Supplemental targeted assistance keeps its row after FY2025 because its going is part of the change: H.B. 96 repealed it, and the base funding and enrollment growth supplements it created are separate lines, not its replacement under another name.

The phase-in Contents

Foundation aid is paid as the funding base plus the The share of the gap between what the formula computes and a district's older base that is actually paid. A district below its base is held at the base, so a higher phase-in does not reach it.'s share of the gap between what the formula calculates and that base, and the guarantee holds it up where the result would fall. These are the department's own three figures for each year. FY2025 is the department's final payment report; FY2026 and FY2027 are its models of those years, not payments. Every figure is in nominal dollars.

Stage FY2025 paidFY2026 modelFY2027 model
Funding base$2,249,752$2,249,752$2,249,752
Calculated by the formula$2,396,478$1,626,555$1,515,633
Paid through the phase-in$2,347,574$1,730,442$1,515,633
Guarantee$0$519,311$734,119
Foundation aid$2,347,574$2,249,752$2,249,752
  • FY2025: +$97,822 above its base. The formula calculates $2,396,478, $146,726 over a $2,249,752 base, and the phase-in pays $97,822 of that gap.
  • FY2026: at its base. The formula calculates $1,626,555 against a $2,249,752 base, and foundation aid is the base itself — the guarantee pays the $519,311 the phase-in leaves short. A higher phase-in rate would not reach it.
  • FY2027: at its base. The formula calculates $1,515,633 against a $2,249,752 base, and foundation aid is the base itself — the guarantee pays the $734,119 the phase-in leaves short. A higher phase-in rate would not reach it.

The phase-in statewide counts the districts paid exactly their base in each year, which a higher rate does not reach, and what it paid above everyone else's.

What moved underneath Contents

Three inputs and the measure each reaches the dollars through. The files publish the inputs and the payment but not how much of the payment's change each input is, so nothing here divides the change between them. The FY2025 payment report carries no capacity inputs at all, so state share and enrollment start at FY2026. Dollar figures are in nominal dollars.

  • State share went from 11.6% in FY2026 to 10.0% in FY2027. It is the part of base cost the state pays after the district's local capacity is charged, so it reaches the dollars through foundation aid, which moved $0 over the same two years. Reappraisal and the state share sets the fall beside every district's valuation change, by the share it started at.
  • Assessed valuation went from $347,109,430 in tax year 2023 to $358,097,855 in tax year 2025 (+3.2%). Valuation is the larger part of local capacity, which is what sets the state share above — the route by which a reappraisal reaches foundation aid at all.
  • Enrolled ADM went from 768.5 in FY2026 to 751.9 in FY2027, as each year's file states it (−2.2%). Base cost is computed per pupil, so enrollment reaches the dollars through the formula's calculated figure on the phase-in card.

This district is at its base in FY2027, so none of the three reaches its foundation aid that year: whatever they did, the guarantee paid the difference.

Transfers and net funding Contents

What the department deducts from total state support before it pays the district — the educational service center's charge and other adjustments — and what is left. FY2025's report publishes the transfers as one total; FY2027's itemizes them; FY2026's publishes none, and that column says so rather than showing a zero. FY2025 is the department's final payment report; FY2026 and FY2027 are its models of those years, not payments. Every figure is in nominal dollars.

FY2025 paidFY2026 modelFY2027 model
Total state support$2,839,810$2,870,044$2,901,669
Service center chargenot itemizednot published−$820,460
Other adjustmentsnot itemizednot published−$15,459
Transfers, in total−$928,196not published−$835,919
Net state funding$1,911,614not published$2,065,749