Find a district › Boardman Local

Boardman Local

What moved this district's funding from FY2025 to FY2027, line by line — on total state support, and on the foundation aid this site models — and where it sits among its county's districts.

Across Mahoning County Contents

FY2026 and FY2027 models, nominal dollars

On total state support, Boardman Local moved −21.1% (−$2,056,676) from FY2026 to FY2027: the largest fall of 14 in Mahoning County.

Poland LocalLowellville LocalStruthers CityCanfield LocalWestern ReserveLocalJackson-MiltonLocalYoungstown CitySpringfield LocalSouth Range LocalSebring LocalWest Branch LocalCampbell CityAustintown LocalSchoolsBoardman Local+2.3%−21.1%
Poland LocalLowellville LocalStruthers CityCanfield LocalWestern Reserve LocalJackson-Milton LocalYoungstown CitySpringfield LocalSouth Range LocalSebring LocalWest Branch LocalCampbell CityAustintown Local SchoolsBoardman Local+2.3%−21.1%
Poland LocalLowellville LocalStruthers CityCanfield LocalWestern Reserve LocalJackson-Milton LocalYoungstown CitySpringfield LocalSouth Range LocalSebring LocalWest Branch LocalCampbell CityAustintown Local SchoolsBoardman Local+2.3%−21.1%
The values
  • Poland Local: +2.3% (+$119,245) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Lowellville Local: +2.3% (+$108,669) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Struthers City: +1.9% (+$311,538) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Canfield Local: +1.6% (+$94,354) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Western Reserve Local: +1.3% (+$48,689) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Jackson-Milton Local: +1.1% (+$31,624) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Youngstown City: +0.9% (+$565,971) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Springfield Local: +0.7% (+$28,410) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • South Range Local: +0.6% (+$34,601) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Sebring Local: +0.4% (+$18,825) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • West Branch Local: 0.0% (−$2,155) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Campbell City: −0.6% (−$87,420) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Austintown Local Schools: −3.2% (−$878,689) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Boardman Local: −21.1% (−$2,056,676) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027

On foundation aid, Boardman Local moved −28.1% (−$2,139,342) from FY2026 to FY2027: the largest fall of 14 in Mahoning County.

Lowellville LocalStruthers CityWestern ReserveLocalYoungstown CityCanfield LocalJackson-MiltonLocalPoland LocalSouth Range LocalSpringfield LocalSebring LocalCampbell CityWest Branch LocalAustintown LocalSchoolsBoardman Local+2.5%−28.1%
Lowellville LocalStruthers CityWestern Reserve LocalYoungstown CityCanfield LocalJackson-Milton LocalPoland LocalSouth Range LocalSpringfield LocalSebring LocalCampbell CityWest Branch LocalAustintown Local SchoolsBoardman Local+2.5%−28.1%
Lowellville LocalStruthers CityWestern Reserve LocalYoungstown CityCanfield LocalJackson-Milton LocalPoland LocalSouth Range LocalSpringfield LocalSebring LocalCampbell CityWest Branch LocalAustintown Local SchoolsBoardman Local+2.5%−28.1%
The values
  • Lowellville Local: +2.5% (+$114,075) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Struthers City: +1.8% (+$286,311) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Western Reserve Local: +0.7% (+$24,794) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Youngstown City: 0.0% ($0) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Canfield Local: 0.0% ($0) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Jackson-Milton Local: 0.0% ($0) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Poland Local: 0.0% ($0) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • South Range Local: 0.0% ($0) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Springfield Local: 0.0% ($0) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Sebring Local: −0.3% (−$15,915) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Campbell City: −0.9% (−$118,288) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • West Branch Local: −1.0% (−$113,043) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Austintown Local Schools: −3.8% (−$976,276) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Boardman Local: −28.1% (−$2,139,342) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027

Every district the department attributes to Mahoning County, as a percentage of its own FY2026 figure, so a city and a village can be read on one scale. The two measures can rank the same county in different orders: a district held at its base does not move on foundation aid at all, whatever its other lines do.

By line Contents

Every line the department pays this district through, in the three years. Total state support, the last row, is all of them; foundation aid, the first, is the narrow measure — core foundation funding and the guarantee, the part this site models. FY2025 is the department's final payment report; FY2026 and FY2027 are its models of those years, not payments. Every figure is in nominal dollars.

Line FY2025 paidFY2026 modelFY2027 model FY2026 to FY2027
Foundation aid (the narrow measure)$8,764,463$7,621,708$5,482,366−$2,139,342
Transportation$1,281,420$1,480,771$1,571,341+$90,570
Special education transportation$174,922$238,430$206,473−$31,957
Preschool special education$285,979$292,931$274,782−$18,148
Supplemental targeted assistance (repealed by H.B. 96)$0$0$0$0
Formula transition supplement$0$0$0$0
Base funding supplement$0$95,213$137,415+$42,202
Enrollment growth supplement$0$0$0$0
Performance supplement$0$0$0$0
Total state support (the wide measure)$10,506,783$9,729,053$7,672,377−$2,056,676

The lines sum to total state support in every year, to within cent rounding. Supplemental targeted assistance keeps its row after FY2025 because its going is part of the change: H.B. 96 repealed it, and the base funding and enrollment growth supplements it created are separate lines, not its replacement under another name.

The phase-in Contents

Foundation aid is paid as the funding base plus the The share of the gap between what the formula computes and a district's older base that is actually paid. A district below its base is held at the base, so a higher phase-in does not reach it.'s share of the gap between what the formula calculates and that base, and the guarantee holds it up where the result would fall. These are the department's own three figures for each year. FY2025 is the department's final payment report; FY2026 and FY2027 are its models of those years, not payments. Every figure is in nominal dollars.

Stage FY2025 paidFY2026 modelFY2027 model
Funding base$5,482,366$5,482,366$5,482,366
Calculated by the formula$10,405,266$8,049,679$5,459,117
Paid through the phase-in$8,764,463$7,621,708$5,459,117
Guarantee$0$0$23,249
Foundation aid$8,764,463$7,621,708$5,482,366
  • FY2025: +$3,282,098 above its base. The formula calculates $10,405,266, $4,922,900 over a $5,482,366 base, and the phase-in pays $3,282,098 of that gap.
  • FY2026: +$2,139,342 above its base. The formula calculates $8,049,679, $2,567,313 over a $5,482,366 base, and the phase-in pays $2,139,342 of that gap.
  • FY2027: at its base. The formula calculates $5,459,117 against a $5,482,366 base, and foundation aid is the base itself — the guarantee pays the $23,249 the phase-in leaves short. A higher phase-in rate would not reach it.

The formula calculates within 0.4% of this district's base in FY2027 — $5,459,117 against $5,482,366 — so the phase-in has almost nothing to phase in, and a change to its rate moves this district by little or nothing.

The phase-in statewide counts the districts paid exactly their base in each year, which a higher rate does not reach, and what it paid above everyone else's.

What moved underneath Contents

Three inputs and the measure each reaches the dollars through. The files publish the inputs and the payment but not how much of the payment's change each input is, so nothing here divides the change between them. The FY2025 payment report carries no capacity inputs at all, so state share and enrollment start at FY2026. Dollar figures are in nominal dollars.

  • State share went from 22.0% in FY2026 to 14.8% in FY2027. It is the part of base cost the state pays after the district's local capacity is charged, so it reaches the dollars through foundation aid, which moved −$2,139,342 over the same two years. Reappraisal and the state share sets the fall beside every district's valuation change, by the share it started at.
  • Assessed valuation went from $1,235,478,620 in tax year 2023 to $1,240,133,983 in tax year 2025 (+0.4%). Valuation is the larger part of local capacity, which is what sets the state share above — the route by which a reappraisal reaches foundation aid at all.
  • Enrolled ADM went from 3,526.4 in FY2026 to 3,435.4 in FY2027, as each year's file states it (−2.6%). Base cost is computed per pupil, so enrollment reaches the dollars through the formula's calculated figure on the phase-in card.

This district is at its base in FY2027, so none of the three reaches its foundation aid that year: whatever they did, the guarantee paid the difference.

Transfers and net funding Contents

What the department deducts from total state support before it pays the district — the educational service center's charge and other adjustments — and what is left. FY2025's report publishes the transfers as one total; FY2027's itemizes them; FY2026's publishes none, and that column says so rather than showing a zero. FY2025 is the department's final payment report; FY2026 and FY2027 are its models of those years, not payments. Every figure is in nominal dollars.

FY2025 paidFY2026 modelFY2027 model
Total state support$10,506,783$9,729,053$7,672,377
Service center chargenot itemizednot published−$1,680,966
Other adjustmentsnot itemizednot published−$102,791
Transfers, in total−$1,902,792not published−$1,783,756
Net state funding$8,603,991not published$5,888,621