Find a district › Fredericktown Local

Fredericktown Local

What moved this district's funding from FY2025 to FY2027, line by line — on total state support, and on the foundation aid this site models — and where it sits among its county's districts.

Across Knox County Contents

FY2026 and FY2027 models, nominal dollars

On total state support, Fredericktown Local moved −2.1% (−$147,478) from FY2026 to FY2027: the 2nd-largest fall of 5 in Knox County.

Danville LocalEast Knox LocalCenterburg LocalMount Vernon CityFredericktownLocal+1.8%−2.1%−3.2%
Danville LocalEast Knox LocalCenterburg LocalMount Vernon CityFredericktown Local+1.8%−2.1%−3.2%
Danville LocalEast Knox LocalCenterburg LocalMount Vernon CityFredericktown Local+1.8%−2.1%−3.2%
The values
  • Danville Local: +1.8% (+$109,039) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • East Knox Local: +0.8% (+$27,028) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Centerburg Local: +0.2% (+$13,054) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Fredericktown Local: −2.1% (−$147,478) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Mount Vernon City: −3.2% (−$594,929) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027

On foundation aid, Fredericktown Local moved −2.9% (−$186,200) from FY2026 to FY2027: the 2nd-largest fall of 5 in Knox County.

Danville LocalCenterburg LocalEast Knox LocalMount Vernon CityFredericktownLocal+2.4%−2.9%−9.7%
Danville LocalCenterburg LocalEast Knox LocalMount Vernon CityFredericktown Local+2.4%−2.9%−9.7%
Danville LocalCenterburg LocalEast Knox LocalMount Vernon CityFredericktown Local+2.4%−2.9%−9.7%
The values
  • Danville Local: +2.4% (+$135,042) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Centerburg Local: 0.0% ($0) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • East Knox Local: 0.0% ($0) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Fredericktown Local: −2.9% (−$186,200) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Mount Vernon City: −9.7% (−$1,563,414) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027

Every district the department attributes to Knox County, as a percentage of its own FY2026 figure, so a city and a village can be read on one scale. The two measures can rank the same county in different orders: a district held at its base does not move on foundation aid at all, whatever its other lines do.

By line Contents

Every line the department pays this district through, in the three years. Total state support, the last row, is all of them; foundation aid, the first, is the narrow measure — core foundation funding and the guarantee, the part this site models. FY2025 is the department's final payment report; FY2026 and FY2027 are its models of those years, not payments. Every figure is in nominal dollars.

Line FY2025 paidFY2026 modelFY2027 model FY2026 to FY2027
Foundation aid (the narrow measure)$6,753,289$6,362,805$6,176,605−$186,200
Transportation$593,535$576,703$602,549+$25,846
Special education transportation$499$563$3,631+$3,069
Preschool special education$55,748$57,787$55,007−$2,780
Supplemental targeted assistance (repealed by H.B. 96)$0$0$0$0
Formula transition supplement$0$0$0$0
Base funding supplement$0$30,146$43,823+$13,677
Enrollment growth supplement$0$0$0$0
Performance supplement$0$58,059$56,970−$1,090
Total state support (the wide measure)$7,403,071$7,086,063$6,938,585−$147,478

The lines sum to total state support in every year, to within cent rounding. Supplemental targeted assistance keeps its row after FY2025 because its going is part of the change: H.B. 96 repealed it, and the base funding and enrollment growth supplements it created are separate lines, not its replacement under another name.

The phase-in Contents

Foundation aid is paid as the funding base plus the The share of the gap between what the formula computes and a district's older base that is actually paid. A district below its base is held at the base, so a higher phase-in does not reach it.'s share of the gap between what the formula calculates and that base, and the guarantee holds it up where the result would fall. These are the department's own three figures for each year. FY2025 is the department's final payment report; FY2026 and FY2027 are its models of those years, not payments. Every figure is in nominal dollars.

Stage FY2025 paidFY2026 modelFY2027 model
Funding base$6,176,605$6,176,605$6,176,605
Calculated by the formula$7,041,587$6,400,054$5,678,436
Paid through the phase-in$6,753,289$6,362,805$5,678,436
Guarantee$0$0$498,169
Foundation aid$6,753,289$6,362,805$6,176,605
  • FY2025: +$576,684 above its base. The formula calculates $7,041,587, $864,982 over a $6,176,605 base, and the phase-in pays $576,684 of that gap.
  • FY2026: +$186,200 above its base. The formula calculates $6,400,054, $223,449 over a $6,176,605 base, and the phase-in pays $186,200 of that gap.
  • FY2027: at its base. The formula calculates $5,678,436 against a $6,176,605 base, and foundation aid is the base itself — the guarantee pays the $498,169 the phase-in leaves short. A higher phase-in rate would not reach it.

The phase-in statewide counts the districts paid exactly their base in each year, which a higher rate does not reach, and what it paid above everyone else's.

What moved underneath Contents

Three inputs and the measure each reaches the dollars through. The files publish the inputs and the payment but not how much of the payment's change each input is, so nothing here divides the change between them. The FY2025 payment report carries no capacity inputs at all, so state share and enrollment start at FY2026. Dollar figures are in nominal dollars.

  • State share went from 44.1% in FY2026 to 37.7% in FY2027. It is the part of base cost the state pays after the district's local capacity is charged, so it reaches the dollars through foundation aid, which moved −$186,200 over the same two years. Reappraisal and the state share sets the fall beside every district's valuation change, by the share it started at.
  • Assessed valuation went from $276,903,740 in tax year 2023 to $282,924,215 in tax year 2025 (+2.2%). Valuation is the larger part of local capacity, which is what sets the state share above — the route by which a reappraisal reaches foundation aid at all.
  • Enrolled ADM went from 1,116.5 in FY2026 to 1,095.6 in FY2027, as each year's file states it (−1.9%). Base cost is computed per pupil, so enrollment reaches the dollars through the formula's calculated figure on the phase-in card.

This district is at its base in FY2027, so none of the three reaches its foundation aid that year: whatever they did, the guarantee paid the difference.

Transfers and net funding Contents

What the department deducts from total state support before it pays the district — the educational service center's charge and other adjustments — and what is left. FY2025's report publishes the transfers as one total; FY2027's itemizes them; FY2026's publishes none, and that column says so rather than showing a zero. FY2025 is the department's final payment report; FY2026 and FY2027 are its models of those years, not payments. Every figure is in nominal dollars.

FY2025 paidFY2026 modelFY2027 model
Total state support$7,403,071$7,086,063$6,938,585
Service center chargenot itemizednot published−$7,365
Other adjustmentsnot itemizednot published−$72,851
Transfers, in total−$67,580not published−$80,216
Net state funding$7,335,491not published$6,858,369