Find a district › Monroeville Local

Monroeville Local

What its pupils achieve, and how little of it the funding side explains.

Against districts with comparable poverty

This district
82.9
A district's tested students distributed across Ohio's achievement levels, weighted so higher levels count for more. It tracks the economically disadvantaged share at −0.85, so most of what it appears to say about a district is poverty. Performance Index →, 2024-25
Median of its poverty fifth
92.3
121 districts in the second-least-poor fifth, 31%–42% economically disadvantaged
Difference
−9.4
points, against like-composed districts

Monroeville Local scores 9.4 points below the median of its poverty fifth: 82.9 against 92.3. Every district in that fifth, by Performance Index — the shaded box is its middle half, and the rule marked Monroeville Local is this district. The gap in the third tile is worth what the width of this box says it is worth.

Performance Index 82.9 2nd percentile of its fifth
80100Monroeville LocalFifth's median 92.3Ohio median 88.3
80100Monroeville LocalFifth's median 92.3Ohio median 88.3
80100Monroeville LocalFifth's median 92.3Ohio median 88.3
The values
  • Paint Valley Local: Performance Index 76.6, 41% economically disadvantaged
  • Preble Shawnee Local: Performance Index 79.7, 37% economically disadvantaged
  • Monroeville Local: Performance Index 82.9, 39% economically disadvantaged
  • Madison Local: Performance Index 84.2, 34% economically disadvantaged
  • Fayetteville-Perry Local: Performance Index 84.3, 38% economically disadvantaged
  • Licking Valley Local: Performance Index 85.0, 39% economically disadvantaged
  • New Richmond Exempted Village: Performance Index 85.1, 40% economically disadvantaged
  • Elmwood Local: Performance Index 85.2, 40% economically disadvantaged
  • Crestwood Local: Performance Index 86.0, 36% economically disadvantaged
  • Wolf Creek Local: Performance Index 86.1, 40% economically disadvantaged
  • Shaker Heights City: Performance Index 86.6, 38% economically disadvantaged
  • Perkins Local: Performance Index 86.7, 38% economically disadvantaged
  • Bethel Local: Performance Index 87.0, 39% economically disadvantaged
  • Northridge Local: Performance Index 87.1, 34% economically disadvantaged
  • Highland Local: Performance Index 87.1, 39% economically disadvantaged
  • Wauseon Exempted Village: Performance Index 87.1, 41% economically disadvantaged
  • Berkshire Local: Performance Index 87.2, 32% economically disadvantaged
  • Keystone Local: Performance Index 87.2, 32% economically disadvantaged
  • Triad Local: Performance Index 87.3, 32% economically disadvantaged
  • Holgate Local: Performance Index 87.5, 31% economically disadvantaged
  • Southeast Local: Performance Index 87.5, 40% economically disadvantaged
  • Southeastern Local: Performance Index 87.8, 38% economically disadvantaged
  • Talawanda City: Performance Index 87.9, 39% economically disadvantaged
  • Vandalia-Butler City: Performance Index 87.9, 40% economically disadvantaged
  • Pleasant Local: Performance Index 88.0, 38% economically disadvantaged
  • Streetsboro City: Performance Index 88.0, 39% economically disadvantaged
  • Rootstown Local: Performance Index 88.1, 37% economically disadvantaged
  • Northern Local: Performance Index 88.1, 39% economically disadvantaged
  • Allen East Local: Performance Index 88.2, 41% economically disadvantaged
  • Berne Union Local: Performance Index 88.4, 42% economically disadvantaged
  • Wapakoneta City: Performance Index 88.5, 40% economically disadvantaged
  • Greeneview Local: Performance Index 88.6, 41% economically disadvantaged
  • Liberty Union-Thurston Local: Performance Index 88.7, 37% economically disadvantaged
  • West Holmes Local: Performance Index 88.8, 40% economically disadvantaged
  • Valley View Local: Performance Index 89.1, 39% economically disadvantaged
  • Clear Fork Valley Local: Performance Index 89.1, 39% economically disadvantaged
  • Warren Local: Performance Index 89.4, 41% economically disadvantaged
  • Woodmore Local: Performance Index 89.6, 31% economically disadvantaged
  • Tallmadge City: Performance Index 89.6, 34% economically disadvantaged
  • Delaware City: Performance Index 89.7, 37% economically disadvantaged
  • Gahanna-Jefferson City: Performance Index 89.7, 39% economically disadvantaged
  • Old Fort Local: Performance Index 89.8, 37% economically disadvantaged
  • Hilliard City: Performance Index 90.0, 35% economically disadvantaged
  • Mechanicsburg Exempted Village: Performance Index 90.0, 41% economically disadvantaged
  • Riverside Local: Performance Index 90.2, 32% economically disadvantaged
  • Bryan City: Performance Index 90.5, 39% economically disadvantaged
  • Field Local: Performance Index 90.6, 40% economically disadvantaged
  • Lucas Local: Performance Index 90.7, 38% economically disadvantaged
  • Swanton Local: Performance Index 90.8, 40% economically disadvantaged
  • Northmor Local: Performance Index 90.8, 41% economically disadvantaged
  • Benjamin Logan Local: Performance Index 90.9, 35% economically disadvantaged
  • Pickerington Local: Performance Index 90.9, 41% economically disadvantaged
  • James A Garfield Local: Performance Index 90.9, 42% economically disadvantaged
  • Edon Northwest Local: Performance Index 91.0, 32% economically disadvantaged
  • Northwestern Local: Performance Index 91.1, 41% economically disadvantaged
  • Tri-Valley Local: Performance Index 91.2, 35% economically disadvantaged
  • Southwest Licking Local: Performance Index 91.3, 40% economically disadvantaged
  • Stow-Munroe Falls City School District: Performance Index 91.6, 37% economically disadvantaged
  • Colonel Crawford Local: Performance Index 92.1, 34% economically disadvantaged
  • Fairfield Local: Performance Index 92.2, 40% economically disadvantaged
  • Clinton-Massie Local: Performance Index 92.3, 32% economically disadvantaged
  • Lebanon City: Performance Index 92.3, 33% economically disadvantaged
  • Southwest Local: Performance Index 92.4, 39% economically disadvantaged
  • Continental Local: Performance Index 92.4, 42% economically disadvantaged
  • Strasburg-Franklin Local: Performance Index 92.7, 33% economically disadvantaged
  • Teays Valley Local: Performance Index 92.9, 38% economically disadvantaged
  • Crestview Local: Performance Index 92.9, 42% economically disadvantaged
  • Genoa Area Local: Performance Index 93.3, 33% economically disadvantaged
  • Ashland City: Performance Index 93.3, 42% economically disadvantaged
  • Hillsdale Local: Performance Index 93.5, 39% economically disadvantaged
  • Fredericktown Local: Performance Index 93.5, 41% economically disadvantaged
  • Amherst Exempted Village: Performance Index 93.7, 34% economically disadvantaged
  • Mentor Exempted Village: Performance Index 93.9, 36% economically disadvantaged
  • Shawnee Local: Performance Index 94.0, 35% economically disadvantaged
  • Worthington City: Performance Index 94.3, 32% economically disadvantaged
  • Sylvania Schools: Performance Index 94.4, 32% economically disadvantaged
  • Green Local: Performance Index 94.5, 37% economically disadvantaged
  • Parkway Local: Performance Index 94.6, 36% economically disadvantaged
  • Tuscarawas Valley Local: Performance Index 94.6, 38% economically disadvantaged
  • Louisville City: Performance Index 94.7, 40% economically disadvantaged
  • Lincolnview Local: Performance Index 94.8, 39% economically disadvantaged
  • Central Local: Performance Index 95.0, 42% economically disadvantaged
  • Yellow Springs Exempted Village: Performance Index 95.1, 35% economically disadvantaged
  • Antwerp Local: Performance Index 95.1, 36% economically disadvantaged
  • Shadyside Local: Performance Index 95.1, 40% economically disadvantaged
  • Ontario Local: Performance Index 95.2, 31% economically disadvantaged
  • Columbia Local: Performance Index 95.3, 31% economically disadvantaged
  • Patrick Henry Local: Performance Index 95.3, 38% economically disadvantaged
  • Triway Local: Performance Index 95.3, 40% economically disadvantaged
  • Brookville Local: Performance Index 95.5, 35% economically disadvantaged
  • East Muskingum Local: Performance Index 95.5, 41% economically disadvantaged
  • Danbury Local: Performance Index 95.8, 35% economically disadvantaged
  • Ansonia Local: Performance Index 95.9, 41% economically disadvantaged
  • Edison Local (formerly Berlin-Milan): Performance Index 96.0, 41% economically disadvantaged
  • Franklin Monroe Local: Performance Index 96.1, 34% economically disadvantaged
  • Lakota Local: Performance Index 96.2, 32% economically disadvantaged
  • Cloverleaf Local: Performance Index 96.2, 40% economically disadvantaged
  • Hopewell-Loudon Local: Performance Index 96.3, 34% economically disadvantaged
  • Mayfield City: Performance Index 96.4, 33% economically disadvantaged
  • Western Reserve Local: Performance Index 96.6, 32% economically disadvantaged
  • Hardin-Houston Local: Performance Index 97.0, 40% economically disadvantaged
  • Garaway Local: Performance Index 97.1, 34% economically disadvantaged
  • Mohawk Local: Performance Index 97.3, 31% economically disadvantaged
  • Fairview Park City: Performance Index 97.3, 33% economically disadvantaged
  • Arcanum-Butler Local: Performance Index 97.3, 35% economically disadvantaged
  • Manchester Local: Performance Index 97.3, 35% economically disadvantaged
  • Crestview Local: Performance Index 98.0, 35% economically disadvantaged
  • Ross Local: Performance Index 98.1, 34% economically disadvantaged
  • Benton Carroll Salem Local: Performance Index 98.4, 37% economically disadvantaged
  • Huron City Schools: Performance Index 98.6, 37% economically disadvantaged
  • Norwayne Local: Performance Index 99.3, 33% economically disadvantaged
  • Northwest Local: Performance Index 99.4, 35% economically disadvantaged
  • Evergreen Local: Performance Index 99.5, 31% economically disadvantaged
  • Columbus Grove Local: Performance Index 99.5, 36% economically disadvantaged
  • Columbiana Exempted Village: Performance Index 99.6, 33% economically disadvantaged
  • Seneca East Local: Performance Index 99.8, 32% economically disadvantaged
  • Dalton Local: Performance Index 100.0, 31% economically disadvantaged
  • Chippewa Local: Performance Index 101.4, 41% economically disadvantaged
  • Hicksville Exempted Village: Performance Index 102.0, 41% economically disadvantaged
  • Jackson Center Local: Performance Index 102.5, 31% economically disadvantaged
  • Cuyahoga Heights Local: Performance Index 102.5, 35% economically disadvantaged

Ohio's attainment measure tracks economic disadvantage at −0.846 statewide, so comparing this district to the state median would mostly be comparing its poverty rate to the state's. The middle tile is the comparison worth making, and the difference between them is what is left after one crude control.

It is not an effect of anything. Districts are not assigned to a poverty fifth at random, the fifths are wide, and a single year of a measure that barely moves cannot separate a school's contribution from its intake. See what this data can and cannot say.

Outcomes

Performance Index, 2022-2380.5
Performance Index, 2023-2482.3
Performance Index, 2024-2582.9
Progress, three-year average
The department's headline growth measure, and the one every correlation on this site uses.
 −0.06
Progress, one year
The same measure without the smoothing, also published.
 −0.13
Operating spending per enrolled pupil $18,175
Operating spending per need-weighted pupil $13,713
Economically disadvantaged (report card) 100.0%
English learners —
Students with disabilities 15.0%

The Performance Index is close to a fixed district trait across these three years, which is why a change in funding is unlikely to show up in it. Progress is the measure that moves. Both are 2024-25; the spending figures are FY2025.

Both growth measures point the same way here (−0.06 over three years, −0.13 over one). Statewide the two correlate at 0.90, and of the 534 districts printing a non-zero value on both, 44 point opposite ways — none of them with both magnitudes above 0.05. This site uses the three-year figure throughout, because a single year of value-added is noisy enough that the department smooths it deliberately.

The two economically-disadvantaged shares on this page differ: the report card's is top-coded by community eligibility, the profile report's (38.7%) is not.

Two mistakes this page is built to prevent

Reading a correlation with poverty as a correlation with something elseEconomic disadvantage explains Ohio's attainment measure at −0.846. Most other district-level variables are that one in disguise — including, sharply, guarantee status. Every association statewide, with its controlled figure beside it.
Quoting a per-pupil number without its denominatorThe two spending figures above share a numerator. The department's divides by a need-weighted count; the other divides by headcount. Against an outcome that is itself composition-driven, the first is substantially a composition proxy — statewide the same numerator gives −0.004 one way and −0.355 the other.

Nothing on this page is causal, and nothing on it is a judgment about this district's schools. What it funds is on the dashboard; what it actually collected and spent is in its finances.