Find a district › Oak Hills Local

Oak Hills Local

What moved this district's funding from FY2025 to FY2027, line by line — on total state support, and on the foundation aid this site models — and where it sits among its county's districts.

Across Hamilton County Contents

FY2026 and FY2027 models, nominal dollars

On total state support, Oak Hills Local moved +1.3% (+$358,475) from FY2026 to FY2027: the 11th-largest rise of 22 in Hamilton County.

St Bernard-ElmwoodPlace CitySycamoreCommunity CityWinton Woods CityLockland LocalPrinceton CityMadeira CityMariemont CityLoveland CityNorthwest LocalDeer ParkCommunity CityForest Hills LocalFinneytown LocalWyoming CityCincinnati PublicSchoolsThree Rivers LocalNorwood CityMt Healthy CitySouthwest LocalReading CommunityCityIndian Hill ExemptedVillageNorth College HillCityOak Hills Local+13.5%+1.3%−7.9%
St Bernard-Elmwood PlaceCitySycamore Community CityWinton Woods CityLockland LocalPrinceton CityMadeira CityMariemont CityLoveland CityNorthwest LocalDeer Park Community CityForest Hills LocalFinneytown LocalWyoming CityCincinnati Public SchoolsThree Rivers LocalNorwood CityMt Healthy CitySouthwest LocalReading Community CityIndian Hill Exempted VillageNorth College Hill CityOak Hills Local+13.5%+1.3%−7.9%
St Bernard-Elmwood Place CitySycamore Community CityWinton Woods CityLockland LocalPrinceton CityMadeira CityMariemont CityLoveland CityNorthwest LocalDeer Park Community CityForest Hills LocalFinneytown LocalWyoming CityCincinnati Public SchoolsThree Rivers LocalNorwood CityMt Healthy CitySouthwest LocalReading Community CityIndian Hill Exempted VillageNorth College Hill CityOak Hills Local+13.5%+1.3%−7.9%
The values
  • St Bernard-Elmwood Place City: +13.5% (+$994,963) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Sycamore Community City: +13.3% (+$1,342,601) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Winton Woods City: +11.6% (+$3,653,970) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Lockland Local: +11.2% (+$585,644) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Princeton City: +7.3% (+$828,542) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Madeira City: +3.2% (+$93,403) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Mariemont City: +2.5% (+$82,365) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Loveland City: +2.0% (+$264,567) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Northwest Local: +1.7% (+$501,763) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Deer Park Community City: +1.4% (+$47,308) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Oak Hills Local: +1.3% (+$358,475) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Forest Hills Local: +1.3% (+$243,825) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Finneytown Local: +1.1% (+$75,547) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Wyoming City: +0.3% (+$18,819) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Cincinnati Public Schools: +0.3% (+$417,327) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Three Rivers Local: +0.3% (+$17,220) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Norwood City: 0.0% (−$929) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Mt Healthy City: −1.8% (−$447,404) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Southwest Local: −2.0% (−$364,848) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Reading Community City: −3.3% (−$281,776) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Indian Hill Exempted Village: −4.2% (−$143,527) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • North College Hill City: −7.9% (−$1,103,836) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027

On foundation aid, Oak Hills Local moved 0.0% ($0) from FY2026 to FY2027: one of 10 of 22 in Hamilton County that did not move.

Indian Hill ExemptedVillageSycamoreCommunity CityLockland LocalSt Bernard-ElmwoodPlace CityWinton Woods CityDeer ParkCommunity CityLoveland CityMadeira CityMariemont CityNorwood CityWyoming CityFinneytown LocalForest Hills LocalNorthwest LocalPrinceton CityMt Healthy CityThree Rivers LocalReading CommunityCitySouthwest LocalNorth College HillCityCincinnati PublicSchoolsOak Hills Local+13.6%0.0%−11.2%
Indian Hill Exempted VillageSycamore Community CityLockland LocalSt Bernard-Elmwood PlaceCityWinton Woods CityDeer Park Community CityLoveland CityMadeira CityMariemont CityNorwood CityWyoming CityFinneytown LocalForest Hills LocalNorthwest LocalPrinceton CityMt Healthy CityThree Rivers LocalReading Community CitySouthwest LocalNorth College Hill CityCincinnati Public SchoolsOak Hills Local+13.6%0.0%−11.2%
Indian Hill Exempted VillageSycamore Community CityLockland LocalSt Bernard-Elmwood Place CityWinton Woods CityDeer Park Community CityLoveland CityMadeira CityMariemont CityNorwood CityWyoming CityFinneytown LocalForest Hills LocalNorthwest LocalPrinceton CityMt Healthy CityThree Rivers LocalReading Community CitySouthwest LocalNorth College Hill CityCincinnati Public SchoolsOak Hills Local+13.6%0.0%−11.2%
The values
  • Indian Hill Exempted Village: +13.6% (+$235,850) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Sycamore Community City: +13.1% (+$642,978) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Lockland Local: +12.8% (+$618,188) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • St Bernard-Elmwood Place City: +11.1% (+$783,124) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Winton Woods City: +10.1% (+$2,831,985) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Deer Park Community City: 0.0% ($0) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Loveland City: 0.0% ($0) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Madeira City: 0.0% ($0) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Mariemont City: 0.0% ($0) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Norwood City: 0.0% ($0) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Wyoming City: 0.0% ($0) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Finneytown Local: 0.0% ($0) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Forest Hills Local: 0.0% ($0) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Northwest Local: 0.0% ($0) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Oak Hills Local: 0.0% ($0) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Princeton City: 0.0% (−$1,902) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Mt Healthy City: −0.9% (−$201,736) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Three Rivers Local: −1.6% (−$89,136) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Reading Community City: −3.5% (−$294,129) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Southwest Local: −6.0% (−$972,403) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • North College Hill City: −7.6% (−$1,037,751) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Cincinnati Public Schools: −11.2% (−$14,225,015) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027

Every district the department attributes to Hamilton County, as a percentage of its own FY2026 figure, so a city and a village can be read on one scale. The two measures can rank the same county in different orders: a district held at its base does not move on foundation aid at all, whatever its other lines do.

By line Contents

Every line the department pays this district through, in the three years. Total state support, the last row, is all of them; foundation aid, the first, is the narrow measure — core foundation funding and the guarantee, the part this site models. FY2025 is the department's final payment report; FY2026 and FY2027 are its models of those years, not payments. Every figure is in nominal dollars.

Line FY2025 paidFY2026 modelFY2027 model FY2026 to FY2027
Foundation aid (the narrow measure)$24,347,395$24,347,395$24,347,395$0
Transportation$1,019,036$1,176,069$1,344,855+$168,787
Special education transportation$556,422$758,440$926,155+$167,715
Preschool special education$647,401$652,418$598,887−$53,531
Supplemental targeted assistance (repealed by H.B. 96)$0$0$0$0
Formula transition supplement$123,880$0$0$0
Base funding supplement$0$187,998$271,987+$83,990
Enrollment growth supplement$0$0$0$0
Performance supplement$0$362,069$353,583−$8,486
Total state support (the wide measure)$26,694,135$27,484,389$27,842,863+$358,475

The lines sum to total state support in every year, to within cent rounding. Supplemental targeted assistance keeps its row after FY2025 because its going is part of the change: H.B. 96 repealed it, and the base funding and enrollment growth supplements it created are separate lines, not its replacement under another name.

The phase-in Contents

Foundation aid is paid as the funding base plus the The share of the gap between what the formula computes and a district's older base that is actually paid. A district below its base is held at the base, so a higher phase-in does not reach it.'s share of the gap between what the formula calculates and that base, and the guarantee holds it up where the result would fall. These are the department's own three figures for each year. FY2025 is the department's final payment report; FY2026 and FY2027 are its models of those years, not payments. Every figure is in nominal dollars.

Stage FY2025 paidFY2026 modelFY2027 model
Funding base$24,347,395$24,347,395$24,347,395
Calculated by the formula$21,315,338$17,877,593$14,034,311
Paid through the phase-in$22,325,922$18,956,109$14,034,311
Guarantee$2,021,473$5,391,286$10,313,085
Foundation aid$24,347,395$24,347,395$24,347,395
  • FY2025: at its base. The formula calculates $21,315,338 against a $24,347,395 base, and foundation aid is the base itself — the guarantee pays the $2,021,473 the phase-in leaves short. A higher phase-in rate would not reach it.
  • FY2026: at its base. The formula calculates $17,877,593 against a $24,347,395 base, and foundation aid is the base itself — the guarantee pays the $5,391,286 the phase-in leaves short. A higher phase-in rate would not reach it.
  • FY2027: at its base. The formula calculates $14,034,311 against a $24,347,395 base, and foundation aid is the base itself — the guarantee pays the $10,313,085 the phase-in leaves short. A higher phase-in rate would not reach it.

The phase-in statewide counts the districts paid exactly their base in each year, which a higher rate does not reach, and what it paid above everyone else's.

What moved underneath Contents

Three inputs and the measure each reaches the dollars through. The files publish the inputs and the payment but not how much of the payment's change each input is, so nothing here divides the change between them. The FY2025 payment report carries no capacity inputs at all, so state share and enrollment start at FY2026. Dollar figures are in nominal dollars.

  • State share went from 22.5% in FY2026 to 16.4% in FY2027. It is the part of base cost the state pays after the district's local capacity is charged, so it reaches the dollars through foundation aid, which moved $0 over the same two years. Reappraisal and the state share sets the fall beside every district's valuation change, by the share it started at.
  • Assessed valuation went from $1,672,114,180 in tax year 2023 to $1,687,831,855 in tax year 2025 (+0.9%). Valuation is the larger part of local capacity, which is what sets the state share above — the route by which a reappraisal reaches foundation aid at all.
  • Enrolled ADM went from 6,962.9 in FY2026 to 6,799.7 in FY2027, as each year's file states it (−2.3%). Base cost is computed per pupil, so enrollment reaches the dollars through the formula's calculated figure on the phase-in card.

This district is at its base in FY2027, so none of the three reaches its foundation aid that year: whatever they did, the guarantee paid the difference.

Transfers and net funding Contents

What the department deducts from total state support before it pays the district — the educational service center's charge and other adjustments — and what is left. FY2025's report publishes the transfers as one total; FY2027's itemizes them; FY2026's publishes none, and that column says so rather than showing a zero. FY2025 is the department's final payment report; FY2026 and FY2027 are its models of those years, not payments. Every figure is in nominal dollars.

FY2025 paidFY2026 modelFY2027 model
Total state support$26,694,135$27,484,389$27,842,863
Service center chargenot itemizednot published−$47,710
Other adjustmentsnot itemizednot published−$319,580
Transfers, in total−$366,752not published−$367,290
Net state funding$26,327,383not published$27,475,573