Find a district › Pike-Delta-York Local

Pike-Delta-York Local

What moved this district's funding from FY2025 to FY2027, line by line — on total state support, and on the foundation aid this site models — and where it sits among its county's districts.

Across Fulton County Contents

FY2026 and FY2027 models, nominal dollars

On total state support, Pike-Delta-York Local moved −3.7% (−$286,049) from FY2026 to FY2027: the 2nd-largest fall of 7 in Fulton County.

Wauseon ExemptedVillageArchbold-Area LocalSwanton LocalEvergreen LocalFayette LocalPettisville LocalPike-Delta-YorkLocal+3.0%−3.7%−7.8%
Wauseon Exempted VillageArchbold-Area LocalSwanton LocalEvergreen LocalFayette LocalPettisville LocalPike-Delta-York Local+3.0%−3.7%−7.8%
Wauseon Exempted VillageArchbold-Area LocalSwanton LocalEvergreen LocalFayette LocalPettisville LocalPike-Delta-York Local+3.0%−3.7%−7.8%
The values
  • Wauseon Exempted Village: +3.0% (+$410,394) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Archbold-Area Local: +0.6% (+$25,648) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Swanton Local: +0.6% (+$32,609) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Evergreen Local: +0.1% (+$6,833) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Fayette Local: −2.5% (−$95,141) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Pike-Delta-York Local: −3.7% (−$286,049) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Pettisville Local: −7.8% (−$362,835) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027

On foundation aid, Pike-Delta-York Local moved −4.8% (−$325,117) from FY2026 to FY2027: the 2nd-largest fall of 7 in Fulton County.

Wauseon ExemptedVillageArchbold-Area LocalEvergreen LocalSwanton LocalFayette LocalPettisville LocalPike-Delta-YorkLocal+3.4%−4.8%−7.6%
Wauseon Exempted VillageArchbold-Area LocalEvergreen LocalSwanton LocalFayette LocalPettisville LocalPike-Delta-York Local+3.4%−4.8%−7.6%
Wauseon Exempted VillageArchbold-Area LocalEvergreen LocalSwanton LocalFayette LocalPettisville LocalPike-Delta-York Local+3.4%−4.8%−7.6%
The values
  • Wauseon Exempted Village: +3.4% (+$413,403) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Archbold-Area Local: 0.0% ($0) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Evergreen Local: 0.0% ($0) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Swanton Local: 0.0% ($0) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Fayette Local: −2.4% (−$81,056) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Pike-Delta-York Local: −4.8% (−$325,117) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Pettisville Local: −7.6% (−$322,987) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027

Every district the department attributes to Fulton County, as a percentage of its own FY2026 figure, so a city and a village can be read on one scale. The two measures can rank the same county in different orders: a district held at its base does not move on foundation aid at all, whatever its other lines do.

By line Contents

Every line the department pays this district through, in the three years. Total state support, the last row, is all of them; foundation aid, the first, is the narrow measure — core foundation funding and the guarantee, the part this site models. FY2025 is the department's final payment report; FY2026 and FY2027 are its models of those years, not payments. Every figure is in nominal dollars.

Line FY2025 paidFY2026 modelFY2027 model FY2026 to FY2027
Foundation aid (the narrow measure)$6,807,601$6,775,345$6,450,228−$325,117
Transportation$555,218$549,385$573,335+$23,950
Special education transportation$70,059$80,609$92,311+$11,702
Preschool special education$183,205$192,326$184,501−$7,825
Supplemental targeted assistance (repealed by H.B. 96)$0$0$0$0
Formula transition supplement$0$0$0$0
Base funding supplement$0$28,858$41,598+$12,741
Enrollment growth supplement$0$0$0$0
Performance supplement$0$55,578$54,078−$1,500
Total state support (the wide measure)$7,616,083$7,682,101$7,396,051−$286,049

The lines sum to total state support in every year, to within cent rounding. Supplemental targeted assistance keeps its row after FY2025 because its going is part of the change: H.B. 96 repealed it, and the base funding and enrollment growth supplements it created are separate lines, not its replacement under another name.

The phase-in Contents

Foundation aid is paid as the funding base plus the The share of the gap between what the formula computes and a district's older base that is actually paid. A district below its base is held at the base, so a higher phase-in does not reach it.'s share of the gap between what the formula calculates and that base, and the guarantee holds it up where the result would fall. These are the department's own three figures for each year. FY2025 is the department's final payment report; FY2026 and FY2027 are its models of those years, not payments. Every figure is in nominal dollars.

Stage FY2025 paidFY2026 modelFY2027 model
Funding base$5,958,973$5,958,973$5,958,973
Calculated by the formula$7,231,851$6,938,658$6,450,228
Paid through the phase-in$6,807,601$6,775,345$6,450,228
Guarantee$0$0$0
Foundation aid$6,807,601$6,775,345$6,450,228
  • FY2025: +$848,628 above its base. The formula calculates $7,231,851, $1,272,879 over a $5,958,973 base, and the phase-in pays $848,628 of that gap.
  • FY2026: +$816,372 above its base. The formula calculates $6,938,658, $979,686 over a $5,958,973 base, and the phase-in pays $816,372 of that gap.
  • FY2027: +$491,255 above its base. The formula calculates $6,450,228, $491,255 over a $5,958,973 base, and the phase-in pays $491,255 of that gap.

The phase-in statewide counts the districts paid exactly their base in each year, which a higher rate does not reach, and what it paid above everyone else's.

What moved underneath Contents

Three inputs and the measure each reaches the dollars through. The files publish the inputs and the payment but not how much of the payment's change each input is, so nothing here divides the change between them. The FY2025 payment report carries no capacity inputs at all, so state share and enrollment start at FY2026. Dollar figures are in nominal dollars.

  • State share went from 44.6% in FY2026 to 39.0% in FY2027. It is the part of base cost the state pays after the district's local capacity is charged, so it reaches the dollars through foundation aid, which moved −$325,117 over the same two years. Reappraisal and the state share sets the fall beside every district's valuation change, by the share it started at.
  • Assessed valuation went from $259,153,200 in tax year 2023 to $259,784,140 in tax year 2025 (+0.2%). Valuation is the larger part of local capacity, which is what sets the state share above — the route by which a reappraisal reaches foundation aid at all.
  • Enrolled ADM went from 1,068.8 in FY2026 to 1,040.0 in FY2027, as each year's file states it (−2.7%). Base cost is computed per pupil, so enrollment reaches the dollars through the formula's calculated figure on the phase-in card.

Transfers and net funding Contents

What the department deducts from total state support before it pays the district — the educational service center's charge and other adjustments — and what is left. FY2025's report publishes the transfers as one total; FY2027's itemizes them; FY2026's publishes none, and that column says so rather than showing a zero. FY2025 is the department's final payment report; FY2026 and FY2027 are its models of those years, not payments. Every figure is in nominal dollars.

FY2025 paidFY2026 modelFY2027 model
Total state support$7,616,083$7,682,101$7,396,051
Service center chargenot itemizednot published−$607,267
Other adjustmentsnot itemizednot published−$51,732
Transfers, in total−$984,927not published−$658,999
Net state funding$6,631,156not published$6,737,052