Find a district › Archbold-Area Local

Archbold-Area Local

What moved this district's funding from FY2025 to FY2027, line by line — on total state support, and on the foundation aid this site models — and where it sits among its county's districts.

Across Fulton County Contents

FY2026 and FY2027 models, nominal dollars

On total state support, Archbold-Area Local moved +0.6% (+$25,648) from FY2026 to FY2027: the 2nd-largest rise of 7 in Fulton County.

Wauseon ExemptedVillageSwanton LocalEvergreen LocalFayette LocalPike-Delta-YorkLocalPettisville LocalArchbold-AreaLocal+3.0%+0.6%−7.8%
Wauseon Exempted VillageSwanton LocalEvergreen LocalFayette LocalPike-Delta-York LocalPettisville LocalArchbold-Area Local+3.0%+0.6%−7.8%
Wauseon Exempted VillageSwanton LocalEvergreen LocalFayette LocalPike-Delta-York LocalPettisville LocalArchbold-Area Local+3.0%+0.6%−7.8%
The values
  • Wauseon Exempted Village: +3.0% (+$410,394) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Archbold-Area Local: +0.6% (+$25,648) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Swanton Local: +0.6% (+$32,609) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Evergreen Local: +0.1% (+$6,833) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Fayette Local: −2.5% (−$95,141) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Pike-Delta-York Local: −3.7% (−$286,049) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Pettisville Local: −7.8% (−$362,835) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027

On foundation aid, Archbold-Area Local moved 0.0% ($0) from FY2026 to FY2027: one of 3 of 7 in Fulton County that did not move.

Wauseon ExemptedVillageEvergreen LocalSwanton LocalFayette LocalPike-Delta-YorkLocalPettisville LocalArchbold-AreaLocal+3.4%0.0%−7.6%
Wauseon Exempted VillageEvergreen LocalSwanton LocalFayette LocalPike-Delta-York LocalPettisville LocalArchbold-Area Local+3.4%0.0%−7.6%
Wauseon Exempted VillageEvergreen LocalSwanton LocalFayette LocalPike-Delta-York LocalPettisville LocalArchbold-Area Local+3.4%0.0%−7.6%
The values
  • Wauseon Exempted Village: +3.4% (+$413,403) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Archbold-Area Local: 0.0% ($0) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Evergreen Local: 0.0% ($0) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Swanton Local: 0.0% ($0) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Fayette Local: −2.4% (−$81,056) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Pike-Delta-York Local: −4.8% (−$325,117) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Pettisville Local: −7.6% (−$322,987) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027

Every district the department attributes to Fulton County, as a percentage of its own FY2026 figure, so a city and a village can be read on one scale. The two measures can rank the same county in different orders: a district held at its base does not move on foundation aid at all, whatever its other lines do.

By line Contents

Every line the department pays this district through, in the three years. Total state support, the last row, is all of them; foundation aid, the first, is the narrow measure — core foundation funding and the guarantee, the part this site models. FY2025 is the department's final payment report; FY2026 and FY2027 are its models of those years, not payments. Every figure is in nominal dollars.

Line FY2025 paidFY2026 modelFY2027 model FY2026 to FY2027
Foundation aid (the narrow measure)$3,633,298$3,432,852$3,432,852$0
Transportation$301,762$341,014$355,061+$14,047
Special education transportation$37,369$50,936$66,084+$15,148
Preschool special education$136,866$144,978$141,190−$3,787
Supplemental targeted assistance (repealed by H.B. 96)$0$0$0$0
Formula transition supplement$0$90,429$76,382−$14,047
Base funding supplement$0$30,086$44,486+$14,400
Enrollment growth supplement$0$0$0$0
Performance supplement$0$57,943$57,831−$112
Total state support (the wide measure)$4,109,295$4,148,238$4,173,886+$25,648

The lines sum to total state support in every year, to within cent rounding. Supplemental targeted assistance keeps its row after FY2025 because its going is part of the change: H.B. 96 repealed it, and the base funding and enrollment growth supplements it created are separate lines, not its replacement under another name.

The phase-in Contents

Foundation aid is paid as the funding base plus the The share of the gap between what the formula computes and a district's older base that is actually paid. A district below its base is held at the base, so a higher phase-in does not reach it.'s share of the gap between what the formula calculates and that base, and the guarantee holds it up where the result would fall. These are the department's own three figures for each year. FY2025 is the department's final payment report; FY2026 and FY2027 are its models of those years, not payments. Every figure is in nominal dollars.

Stage FY2025 paidFY2026 modelFY2027 model
Funding base$3,432,852$3,432,852$3,432,852
Calculated by the formula$3,733,506$3,241,019$2,865,586
Paid through the phase-in$3,633,298$3,272,997$2,865,586
Guarantee$0$159,855$567,267
Foundation aid$3,633,298$3,432,852$3,432,852
  • FY2025: +$200,446 above its base. The formula calculates $3,733,506, $300,654 over a $3,432,852 base, and the phase-in pays $200,446 of that gap.
  • FY2026: at its base. The formula calculates $3,241,019 against a $3,432,852 base, and foundation aid is the base itself — the guarantee pays the $159,855 the phase-in leaves short. A higher phase-in rate would not reach it.
  • FY2027: at its base. The formula calculates $2,865,586 against a $3,432,852 base, and foundation aid is the base itself — the guarantee pays the $567,267 the phase-in leaves short. A higher phase-in rate would not reach it.

The phase-in statewide counts the districts paid exactly their base in each year, which a higher rate does not reach, and what it paid above everyone else's.

What moved underneath Contents

Three inputs and the measure each reaches the dollars through. The files publish the inputs and the payment but not how much of the payment's change each input is, so nothing here divides the change between them. The FY2025 payment report carries no capacity inputs at all, so state share and enrollment start at FY2026. Dollar figures are in nominal dollars.

  • State share went from 27.0% in FY2026 to 21.3% in FY2027. It is the part of base cost the state pays after the district's local capacity is charged, so it reaches the dollars through foundation aid, which moved $0 over the same two years. Reappraisal and the state share sets the fall beside every district's valuation change, by the share it started at.
  • Assessed valuation went from $342,615,390 in tax year 2023 to $344,808,811 in tax year 2025 (+0.6%). Valuation is the larger part of local capacity, which is what sets the state share above — the route by which a reappraisal reaches foundation aid at all.
  • Enrolled ADM went from 1,114.3 in FY2026 to 1,112.1 in FY2027, as each year's file states it (−0.2%). Base cost is computed per pupil, so enrollment reaches the dollars through the formula's calculated figure on the phase-in card.

This district is at its base in FY2027, so none of the three reaches its foundation aid that year: whatever they did, the guarantee paid the difference.

Transfers and net funding Contents

What the department deducts from total state support before it pays the district — the educational service center's charge and other adjustments — and what is left. FY2025's report publishes the transfers as one total; FY2027's itemizes them; FY2026's publishes none, and that column says so rather than showing a zero. FY2025 is the department's final payment report; FY2026 and FY2027 are its models of those years, not payments. Every figure is in nominal dollars.

FY2025 paidFY2026 modelFY2027 model
Total state support$4,109,295$4,148,238$4,173,886
Service center chargenot itemizednot published−$791,359
Other adjustmentsnot itemizednot published−$27,732
Transfers, in total−$1,119,119not published−$819,091
Net state funding$2,990,176not published$3,354,795