Find a district › Mount Gilead Exempted Village

Mount Gilead Exempted Village

What moved this district's funding from FY2025 to FY2027, line by line — on total state support, and on the foundation aid this site models — and where it sits among its county's districts.

Across Morrow County Contents

FY2026 and FY2027 models, nominal dollars

On total state support, Mount Gilead Exempted Village moved 0.0% (−$2,777) from FY2026 to FY2027: the 3rd-largest fall of 4 in Morrow County.

Highland LocalNorthmor LocalCardington-LincolnLocalMount GileadExempted Village+0.2%0.0%−5.7%
Highland LocalNorthmor LocalCardington-Lincoln LocalMount Gilead ExemptedVillage+0.2%0.0%−5.7%
Highland LocalNorthmor LocalCardington-Lincoln LocalMount Gilead Exempted Village+0.2%0.0%−5.7%
The values
  • Highland Local: +0.2% (+$17,521) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Mount Gilead Exempted Village: 0.0% (−$2,777) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Northmor Local: 0.0% (−$2,669) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Cardington-Lincoln Local: −5.7% (−$431,023) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027

On foundation aid, Mount Gilead Exempted Village moved 0.0% ($0) from FY2026 to FY2027: one of 3 of 4 in Morrow County that did not move.

Highland LocalNorthmor LocalCardington-LincolnLocalMount GileadExempted Village0.0%−9.1%
Highland LocalNorthmor LocalCardington-Lincoln LocalMount Gilead ExemptedVillage0.0%−9.1%
Highland LocalNorthmor LocalCardington-Lincoln LocalMount Gilead Exempted Village0.0%−9.1%
The values
  • Mount Gilead Exempted Village: 0.0% ($0) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Highland Local: 0.0% ($0) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Northmor Local: 0.0% ($0) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Cardington-Lincoln Local: −9.1% (−$628,363) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027

Every district the department attributes to Morrow County, as a percentage of its own FY2026 figure, so a city and a village can be read on one scale. The two measures can rank the same county in different orders: a district held at its base does not move on foundation aid at all, whatever its other lines do.

By line Contents

Every line the department pays this district through, in the three years. Total state support, the last row, is all of them; foundation aid, the first, is the narrow measure — core foundation funding and the guarantee, the part this site models. FY2025 is the department's final payment report; FY2026 and FY2027 are its models of those years, not payments. Every figure is in nominal dollars.

Line FY2025 paidFY2026 modelFY2027 model FY2026 to FY2027
Foundation aid (the narrow measure)$6,128,573$6,128,573$6,128,573$0
Transportation$414,606$445,456$464,437+$18,981
Special education transportation$73,318$93,480$86,200−$7,279
Preschool special education$170,003$174,952$164,992−$9,960
Supplemental targeted assistance (repealed by H.B. 96)$0$0$0$0
Formula transition supplement$45,358$14,508$0−$14,508
Base funding supplement$0$24,690$35,855+$11,165
Enrollment growth supplement$0$0$0$0
Performance supplement$0$59,440$58,265−$1,175
Total state support (the wide measure)$6,831,858$6,941,099$6,938,322−$2,777

The lines sum to total state support in every year, to within cent rounding. Supplemental targeted assistance keeps its row after FY2025 because its going is part of the change: H.B. 96 repealed it, and the base funding and enrollment growth supplements it created are separate lines, not its replacement under another name.

The phase-in Contents

Foundation aid is paid as the funding base plus the The share of the gap between what the formula computes and a district's older base that is actually paid. A district below its base is held at the base, so a higher phase-in does not reach it.'s share of the gap between what the formula calculates and that base, and the guarantee holds it up where the result would fall. These are the department's own three figures for each year. FY2025 is the department's final payment report; FY2026 and FY2027 are its models of those years, not payments. Every figure is in nominal dollars.

Stage FY2025 paidFY2026 modelFY2027 model
Funding base$6,128,573$6,128,573$6,128,573
Calculated by the formula$5,962,696$5,350,563$4,666,061
Paid through the phase-in$6,017,983$5,480,257$4,666,061
Guarantee$110,590$648,316$1,462,512
Foundation aid$6,128,573$6,128,573$6,128,573
  • FY2025: at its base. The formula calculates $5,962,696 against a $6,128,573 base, and foundation aid is the base itself — the guarantee pays the $110,590 the phase-in leaves short. A higher phase-in rate would not reach it.
  • FY2026: at its base. The formula calculates $5,350,563 against a $6,128,573 base, and foundation aid is the base itself — the guarantee pays the $648,316 the phase-in leaves short. A higher phase-in rate would not reach it.
  • FY2027: at its base. The formula calculates $4,666,061 against a $6,128,573 base, and foundation aid is the base itself — the guarantee pays the $1,462,512 the phase-in leaves short. A higher phase-in rate would not reach it.

The phase-in statewide counts the districts paid exactly their base in each year, which a higher rate does not reach, and what it paid above everyone else's.

What moved underneath Contents

Three inputs and the measure each reaches the dollars through. The files publish the inputs and the payment but not how much of the payment's change each input is, so nothing here divides the change between them. The FY2025 payment report carries no capacity inputs at all, so state share and enrollment start at FY2026. Dollar figures are in nominal dollars.

  • State share went from 37.5% in FY2026 to 30.3% in FY2027. It is the part of base cost the state pays after the district's local capacity is charged, so it reaches the dollars through foundation aid, which moved $0 over the same two years. Reappraisal and the state share sets the fall beside every district's valuation change, by the share it started at.
  • Assessed valuation went from $275,798,030 in tax year 2023 to $285,068,502 in tax year 2025 (+3.4%). Valuation is the larger part of local capacity, which is what sets the state share above — the route by which a reappraisal reaches foundation aid at all.
  • Enrolled ADM went from 914.5 in FY2026 to 896.4 in FY2027, as each year's file states it (−2.0%). Base cost is computed per pupil, so enrollment reaches the dollars through the formula's calculated figure on the phase-in card.

This district is at its base in FY2027, so none of the three reaches its foundation aid that year: whatever they did, the guarantee paid the difference.

Transfers and net funding Contents

What the department deducts from total state support before it pays the district — the educational service center's charge and other adjustments — and what is left. FY2025's report publishes the transfers as one total; FY2027's itemizes them; FY2026's publishes none, and that column says so rather than showing a zero. FY2025 is the department's final payment report; FY2026 and FY2027 are its models of those years, not payments. Every figure is in nominal dollars.

FY2025 paidFY2026 modelFY2027 model
Total state support$6,831,858$6,941,099$6,938,322
Service center chargenot itemizednot published−$43,688
Other adjustmentsnot itemizednot published−$61,482
Transfers, in total−$275,872not published−$105,170
Net state funding$6,555,986not published$6,833,152