Find a district › New Philadelphia City

New Philadelphia City

What moved this district's funding from FY2025 to FY2027, line by line — on total state support, and on the foundation aid this site models — and where it sits among its county's districts.

Across Tuscarawas County Contents

FY2026 and FY2027 models, nominal dollars

On total state support, New Philadelphia City moved −2.2% (−$360,934) from FY2026 to FY2027: the largest fall of 8 in Tuscarawas County.

NewcomerstownExempted VillageGaraway LocalTuscarawas ValleyLocalIndian Valley LocalClaymont CityStrasburg-FranklinLocalDover CityNew PhiladelphiaCity+4.2%−2.2%
Newcomerstown ExemptedVillageGaraway LocalTuscarawas Valley LocalIndian Valley LocalClaymont CityStrasburg-Franklin LocalDover CityNew Philadelphia City+4.2%−2.2%
Newcomerstown Exempted VillageGaraway LocalTuscarawas Valley LocalIndian Valley LocalClaymont CityStrasburg-Franklin LocalDover CityNew Philadelphia City+4.2%−2.2%
The values
  • Newcomerstown Exempted Village: +4.2% (+$392,150) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Garaway Local: +1.1% (+$55,801) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Tuscarawas Valley Local: +0.3% (+$20,192) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Indian Valley Local: +0.1% (+$17,798) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Claymont City: +<0.1% (+$2,550) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Strasburg-Franklin Local: −0.4% (−$10,848) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Dover City: −2.0% (−$308,506) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • New Philadelphia City: −2.2% (−$360,934) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027

On foundation aid, New Philadelphia City moved −3.6% (−$527,251) from FY2026 to FY2027: the largest fall of 8 in Tuscarawas County.

NewcomerstownExempted VillageClaymont CityGaraway LocalStrasburg-FranklinLocalTuscarawas ValleyLocalIndian Valley LocalDover CityNew PhiladelphiaCity+4.6%−3.6%
Newcomerstown ExemptedVillageClaymont CityGaraway LocalStrasburg-Franklin LocalTuscarawas Valley LocalIndian Valley LocalDover CityNew Philadelphia City+4.6%−3.6%
Newcomerstown Exempted VillageClaymont CityGaraway LocalStrasburg-Franklin LocalTuscarawas Valley LocalIndian Valley LocalDover CityNew Philadelphia City+4.6%−3.6%
The values
  • Newcomerstown Exempted Village: +4.6% (+$404,838) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Claymont City: 0.0% ($0) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Garaway Local: 0.0% ($0) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Strasburg-Franklin Local: 0.0% ($0) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Tuscarawas Valley Local: 0.0% ($0) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Indian Valley Local: −2.1% (−$247,532) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Dover City: −3.0% (−$429,614) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • New Philadelphia City: −3.6% (−$527,251) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027

Every district the department attributes to Tuscarawas County, as a percentage of its own FY2026 figure, so a city and a village can be read on one scale. The two measures can rank the same county in different orders: a district held at its base does not move on foundation aid at all, whatever its other lines do.

By line Contents

Every line the department pays this district through, in the three years. Total state support, the last row, is all of them; foundation aid, the first, is the narrow measure — core foundation funding and the guarantee, the part this site models. FY2025 is the department's final payment report; FY2026 and FY2027 are its models of those years, not payments. Every figure is in nominal dollars.

Line FY2025 paidFY2026 modelFY2027 model FY2026 to FY2027
Foundation aid (the narrow measure)$14,972,024$14,813,067$14,285,816−$527,251
Transportation$811,886$842,606$950,031+$107,425
Special education transportation$64,330$78,694$118,541+$39,847
Preschool special education$285,582$300,369$289,168−$11,201
Supplemental targeted assistance (repealed by H.B. 96)$0$0$0$0
Formula transition supplement$0$0$0$0
Base funding supplement$0$71,931$104,512+$32,580
Enrollment growth supplement$0$0$0$0
Performance supplement$0$121,218$118,882−$2,336
Total state support (the wide measure)$16,133,822$16,227,885$15,866,950−$360,934

The lines sum to total state support in every year, to within cent rounding. Supplemental targeted assistance keeps its row after FY2025 because its going is part of the change: H.B. 96 repealed it, and the base funding and enrollment growth supplements it created are separate lines, not its replacement under another name.

The phase-in Contents

Foundation aid is paid as the funding base plus the The share of the gap between what the formula computes and a district's older base that is actually paid. A district below its base is held at the base, so a higher phase-in does not reach it.'s share of the gap between what the formula calculates and that base, and the guarantee holds it up where the result would fall. These are the department's own three figures for each year. FY2025 is the department's final payment report; FY2026 and FY2027 are its models of those years, not payments. Every figure is in nominal dollars.

Stage FY2025 paidFY2026 modelFY2027 model
Funding base$10,940,653$10,940,653$10,940,653
Calculated by the formula$16,987,407$15,587,736$14,285,816
Paid through the phase-in$14,972,024$14,813,067$14,285,816
Guarantee$0$0$0
Foundation aid$14,972,024$14,813,067$14,285,816
  • FY2025: +$4,031,371 above its base. The formula calculates $16,987,407, $6,046,754 over a $10,940,653 base, and the phase-in pays $4,031,371 of that gap.
  • FY2026: +$3,872,415 above its base. The formula calculates $15,587,736, $4,647,083 over a $10,940,653 base, and the phase-in pays $3,872,415 of that gap.
  • FY2027: +$3,345,164 above its base. The formula calculates $14,285,816, $3,345,164 over a $10,940,653 base, and the phase-in pays $3,345,164 of that gap.

The phase-in statewide counts the districts paid exactly their base in each year, which a higher rate does not reach, and what it paid above everyone else's.

What moved underneath Contents

Three inputs and the measure each reaches the dollars through. The files publish the inputs and the payment but not how much of the payment's change each input is, so nothing here divides the change between them. The FY2025 payment report carries no capacity inputs at all, so state share and enrollment start at FY2026. Dollar figures are in nominal dollars.

  • State share went from 42.3% in FY2026 to 37.6% in FY2027. It is the part of base cost the state pays after the district's local capacity is charged, so it reaches the dollars through foundation aid, which moved −$527,251 over the same two years. Reappraisal and the state share sets the fall beside every district's valuation change, by the share it started at.
  • Assessed valuation went from $627,337,070 in tax year 2023 to $754,521,026 in tax year 2025 (+20.3%). Valuation is the larger part of local capacity, which is what sets the state share above — the route by which a reappraisal reaches foundation aid at all.
  • Enrolled ADM went from 2,664.1 in FY2026 to 2,612.8 in FY2027, as each year's file states it (−1.9%). Base cost is computed per pupil, so enrollment reaches the dollars through the formula's calculated figure on the phase-in card.

Transfers and net funding Contents

What the department deducts from total state support before it pays the district — the educational service center's charge and other adjustments — and what is left. FY2025's report publishes the transfers as one total; FY2027's itemizes them; FY2026's publishes none, and that column says so rather than showing a zero. FY2025 is the department's final payment report; FY2026 and FY2027 are its models of those years, not payments. Every figure is in nominal dollars.

FY2025 paidFY2026 modelFY2027 model
Total state support$16,133,822$16,227,885$15,866,950
Service center chargenot itemizednot published−$78,209
Other adjustmentsnot itemizednot published−$164,322
Transfers, in total−$337,382not published−$242,531
Net state funding$15,796,440not published$15,624,420