Find a district › Cuyahoga Falls City

Cuyahoga Falls City

What moved this district's funding from FY2025 to FY2027, line by line — on total state support, and on the foundation aid this site models — and where it sits among its county's districts.

Across Summit County Contents

FY2026 and FY2027 models, nominal dollars

On total state support, Cuyahoga Falls City moved −2.4% (−$390,646) from FY2026 to FY2027: the 3rd-largest fall of 17 in Summit County.

Copley-Fairlawn CityRevere LocalWoodridge LocalTwinsburg CityHudson CityNordonia Hills CityStow-Munroe FallsCity School DistrictGreen LocalMogadore LocalCoventry LocalManchester LocalSpringfield LocalAkron CityBarberton CityNorton CityTallmadge CityCuyahoga FallsCity+9.8%−2.4%−8.6%
Copley-Fairlawn CityRevere LocalWoodridge LocalTwinsburg CityHudson CityNordonia Hills CityStow-Munroe Falls City SchoolDistrictGreen LocalMogadore LocalCoventry LocalManchester LocalSpringfield LocalAkron CityBarberton CityNorton CityTallmadge CityCuyahoga Falls City+9.8%−2.4%−8.6%
Copley-Fairlawn CityRevere LocalWoodridge LocalTwinsburg CityHudson CityNordonia Hills CityStow-Munroe Falls City School DistrictGreen LocalMogadore LocalCoventry LocalManchester LocalSpringfield LocalAkron CityBarberton CityNorton CityTallmadge CityCuyahoga Falls City+9.8%−2.4%−8.6%
The values
  • Copley-Fairlawn City: +9.8% (+$368,051) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Revere Local: +6.9% (+$284,773) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Woodridge Local: +4.3% (+$141,930) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Twinsburg City: +4.1% (+$284,356) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Hudson City: +2.5% (+$301,487) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Nordonia Hills City: +2.4% (+$135,174) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Stow-Munroe Falls City School District: +2.0% (+$322,450) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Green Local: +2.0% (+$251,160) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Mogadore Local: +1.5% (+$99,652) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Coventry Local: +1.2% (+$83,708) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Manchester Local: +1.1% (+$63,938) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Springfield Local: +1.1% (+$96,300) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Akron City: +0.4% (+$831,122) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Barberton City: −1.1% (−$334,785) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Cuyahoga Falls City: −2.4% (−$390,646) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Norton City: −6.2% (−$743,329) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Tallmadge City: −8.6% (−$925,673) in total state support, FY2026 to FY2027

On foundation aid, Cuyahoga Falls City moved −4.3% (−$640,025) from FY2026 to FY2027: the 3rd-largest fall of 17 in Summit County.

Copley-Fairlawn CityRevere LocalWoodridge LocalMogadore LocalAkron CityCoventry LocalManchester LocalGreen LocalHudson CityNordonia Hills CitySpringfield LocalTwinsburg CityStow-Munroe FallsCity School DistrictBarberton CityNorton CityTallmadge CityCuyahoga FallsCity+9.9%−4.3%−12.0%
Copley-Fairlawn CityRevere LocalWoodridge LocalMogadore LocalAkron CityCoventry LocalManchester LocalGreen LocalHudson CityNordonia Hills CitySpringfield LocalTwinsburg CityStow-Munroe Falls City SchoolDistrictBarberton CityNorton CityTallmadge CityCuyahoga Falls City+9.9%−4.3%−12.0%
Copley-Fairlawn CityRevere LocalWoodridge LocalMogadore LocalAkron CityCoventry LocalManchester LocalGreen LocalHudson CityNordonia Hills CitySpringfield LocalTwinsburg CityStow-Munroe Falls City School DistrictBarberton CityNorton CityTallmadge CityCuyahoga Falls City+9.9%−4.3%−12.0%
The values
  • Copley-Fairlawn City: +9.9% (+$231,001) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Revere Local: +7.9% (+$180,465) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Woodridge Local: +2.0% (+$41,021) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Mogadore Local: +1.1% (+$70,403) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Akron City: +1.1% (+$1,925,828) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Coventry Local: 0.0% ($0) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Manchester Local: 0.0% ($0) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Green Local: 0.0% ($0) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Hudson City: 0.0% ($0) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Nordonia Hills City: 0.0% ($0) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Springfield Local: 0.0% ($0) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Twinsburg City: 0.0% ($0) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Stow-Munroe Falls City School District: −0.5% (−$76,614) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Barberton City: −1.2% (−$334,546) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Cuyahoga Falls City: −4.3% (−$640,025) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Norton City: −8.2% (−$881,283) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027
  • Tallmadge City: −12.0% (−$1,106,260) in foundation aid, FY2026 to FY2027

Every district the department attributes to Summit County, as a percentage of its own FY2026 figure, so a city and a village can be read on one scale. The two measures can rank the same county in different orders: a district held at its base does not move on foundation aid at all, whatever its other lines do.

By line Contents

Every line the department pays this district through, in the three years. Total state support, the last row, is all of them; foundation aid, the first, is the narrow measure — core foundation funding and the guarantee, the part this site models. FY2025 is the department's final payment report; FY2026 and FY2027 are its models of those years, not payments. Every figure is in nominal dollars.

Line FY2025 paidFY2026 modelFY2027 model FY2026 to FY2027
Foundation aid (the narrow measure)$14,448,217$14,975,272$14,335,247−$640,025
Transportation$318,245$367,545$420,542+$52,996
Special education transportation$208,459$284,143$270,731−$13,412
Preschool special education$313,527$308,103$273,352−$34,751
Supplemental targeted assistance (repealed by H.B. 96)$0$0$0$0
Formula transition supplement$192,211$0$202,885+$202,885
Base funding supplement$0$101,021$142,682+$41,661
Enrollment growth supplement$0$0$0$0
Performance supplement$0$0$0$0
Total state support (the wide measure)$15,480,659$16,036,084$15,645,438−$390,646

The lines sum to total state support in every year, to within cent rounding. Supplemental targeted assistance keeps its row after FY2025 because its going is part of the change: H.B. 96 repealed it, and the base funding and enrollment growth supplements it created are separate lines, not its replacement under another name.

The phase-in Contents

Foundation aid is paid as the funding base plus the The share of the gap between what the formula computes and a district's older base that is actually paid. A district below its base is held at the base, so a higher phase-in does not reach it.'s share of the gap between what the formula calculates and that base, and the guarantee holds it up where the result would fall. These are the department's own three figures for each year. FY2025 is the department's final payment report; FY2026 and FY2027 are its models of those years, not payments. Every figure is in nominal dollars.

Stage FY2025 paidFY2026 modelFY2027 model
Funding base$14,975,272$14,975,272$14,975,272
Calculated by the formula$12,377,399$9,456,760$6,077,920
Paid through the phase-in$13,243,270$10,376,696$6,077,920
Guarantee$1,204,947$4,598,576$8,257,326
Foundation aid$14,448,217$14,975,272$14,335,247
  • FY2025: below its base. The phase-in pays $13,243,270 against a $14,975,272 base, and the guarantee adds $1,204,947.
  • FY2026: at its base. The formula calculates $9,456,760 against a $14,975,272 base, and foundation aid is the base itself — the guarantee pays the $4,598,576 the phase-in leaves short. A higher phase-in rate would not reach it.
  • FY2027: below its base. The phase-in pays $6,077,920 against a $14,975,272 base, and the guarantee adds $8,257,326.

The phase-in statewide counts the districts paid exactly their base in each year, which a higher rate does not reach, and what it paid above everyone else's.

What moved underneath Contents

Three inputs and the measure each reaches the dollars through. The files publish the inputs and the payment but not how much of the payment's change each input is, so nothing here divides the change between them. The FY2025 payment report carries no capacity inputs at all, so state share and enrollment start at FY2026. Dollar figures are in nominal dollars.

  • State share went from 21.9% in FY2026 to 14.0% in FY2027. It is the part of base cost the state pays after the district's local capacity is charged, so it reaches the dollars through foundation aid, which moved −$640,025 over the same two years. Reappraisal and the state share sets the fall beside every district's valuation change, by the share it started at.
  • Assessed valuation went from $1,114,345,660 in tax year 2023 to $1,118,945,820 in tax year 2025 (+0.4%). Valuation is the larger part of local capacity, which is what sets the state share above — the route by which a reappraisal reaches foundation aid at all.
  • Enrolled ADM went from 3,741.5 in FY2026 to 3,567.0 in FY2027, as each year's file states it (−4.7%). Base cost is computed per pupil, so enrollment reaches the dollars through the formula's calculated figure on the phase-in card.

Transfers and net funding Contents

What the department deducts from total state support before it pays the district — the educational service center's charge and other adjustments — and what is left. FY2025's report publishes the transfers as one total; FY2027's itemizes them; FY2026's publishes none, and that column says so rather than showing a zero. FY2025 is the department's final payment report; FY2026 and FY2027 are its models of those years, not payments. Every figure is in nominal dollars.

FY2025 paidFY2026 modelFY2027 model
Total state support$15,480,659$16,036,084$15,645,438
Service center chargenot itemizednot published−$25,253
Other adjustmentsnot itemizednot published−$214,127
Transfers, in total−$477,093not published−$239,379
Net state funding$15,003,566not published$15,406,059