Places › Counties

Van Wert County

3 districts · 3,380 pupils · 1 at the 20-mill floor · richest 1.4× the poorest

All 88 counties, ordered by that ratio. The median Ohio district receives $5,910 per pupil in state aid in FY2027.

The spread inside Van Wert County

Lincolnview Local stands on 1.4× Van Wert City's tax base per pupil: $291,577 against $211,864. Every district in the county by the assessed valuation each of its pupils stands on — one dot each, poorest on the left.

$220K$280KOhio median $247,848Van Wert CityLincolnview Local
$220K$280KOhio median $247,848Van Wert CityLincolnview Local
$220K$280KOhio median $247,848Van Wert CityLincolnview Local
The values
  • Van Wert City: $211,864 per pupil, $6,429 state aid per pupil
  • Crestview Local: $266,546 per pupil, $6,700 state aid per pupil
  • Lincolnview Local: $291,577 per pupil, $6,245 state aid per pupil
DistrictValuation per pupil State aid per pupilPupils
Lincolnview Local
The most property wealth per pupil here
$291,577 $6,245 813
Van Wert City
The least
$211,864 $6,429 1,734

These four figures are the headline; the full comparison puts the two side by side on every measure the panel carries.

Where that sits among the 84 counties with more than one district reporting a tax base — one dot each, narrowest on the left, and the rule marked Van Wert is this county. The median is 2.1× apart.

Richest over poorest district, tax base per pupil 1.4× 8th percentile
1.0×7.0×Van WertMedian 2.1×
1.0×7.0×Van WertMedian 2.1×
1.0×7.0×Van WertMedian 2.1×
The values
  • Adams: 1.1× between its richest and poorest district
  • Carroll: 1.2× between its richest and poorest district
  • Auglaize: 1.2× between its richest and poorest district
  • Harrison: 1.2× between its richest and poorest district
  • Morrow: 1.3× between its richest and poorest district
  • Jackson: 1.3× between its richest and poorest district
  • Meigs: 1.4× between its richest and poorest district
  • Van Wert: 1.4× between its richest and poorest district
  • Preble: 1.4× between its richest and poorest district
  • Paulding: 1.5× between its richest and poorest district
  • Greene: 1.5× between its richest and poorest district
  • Champaign: 1.5× between its richest and poorest district
  • Huron: 1.5× between its richest and poorest district
  • Highland: 1.5× between its richest and poorest district
  • Mercer: 1.5× between its richest and poorest district
  • Pike: 1.6× between its richest and poorest district
  • Geauga: 1.6× between its richest and poorest district
  • Madison: 1.6× between its richest and poorest district
  • Putnam: 1.6× between its richest and poorest district
  • Medina: 1.6× between its richest and poorest district
  • Gallia: 1.7× between its richest and poorest district
  • Holmes: 1.7× between its richest and poorest district
  • Clinton: 1.7× between its richest and poorest district
  • Pickaway: 1.7× between its richest and poorest district
  • Union: 1.7× between its richest and poorest district
  • Henry: 1.7× between its richest and poorest district
  • Sandusky: 1.7× between its richest and poorest district
  • Darke: 1.8× between its richest and poorest district
  • Williams: 1.8× between its richest and poorest district
  • Shelby: 1.8× between its richest and poorest district
  • Guernsey: 1.8× between its richest and poorest district
  • Perry: 1.8× between its richest and poorest district
  • Ashtabula: 1.8× between its richest and poorest district
  • Warren: 1.8× between its richest and poorest district
  • Delaware: 1.9× between its richest and poorest district
  • Fayette: 1.9× between its richest and poorest district
  • Fulton: 2.0× between its richest and poorest district
  • Scioto: 2.0× between its richest and poorest district
  • Washington: 2.0× between its richest and poorest district
  • Clermont: 2.0× between its richest and poorest district
  • Hardin: 2.1× between its richest and poorest district
  • Wood: 2.1× between its richest and poorest district
  • Muskingum: 2.1× between its richest and poorest district
  • Brown: 2.1× between its richest and poorest district
  • Erie: 2.1× between its richest and poorest district
  • Tuscarawas: 2.2× between its richest and poorest district
  • Hancock: 2.3× between its richest and poorest district
  • Coshocton: 2.3× between its richest and poorest district
  • Clark: 2.3× between its richest and poorest district
  • Wyandot: 2.3× between its richest and poorest district
  • Richland: 2.4× between its richest and poorest district
  • Ashland: 2.4× between its richest and poorest district
  • Miami: 2.4× between its richest and poorest district
  • Lawrence: 2.4× between its richest and poorest district
  • Logan: 2.5× between its richest and poorest district
  • Belmont: 2.5× between its richest and poorest district
  • Knox: 2.5× between its richest and poorest district
  • Lucas: 2.6× between its richest and poorest district
  • Portage: 2.6× between its richest and poorest district
  • Ross: 2.6× between its richest and poorest district
  • Licking: 2.6× between its richest and poorest district
  • Marion: 2.6× between its richest and poorest district
  • Seneca: 2.7× between its richest and poorest district
  • Wayne: 2.8× between its richest and poorest district
  • Noble: 2.8× between its richest and poorest district
  • Fairfield: 2.9× between its richest and poorest district
  • Allen: 3.0× between its richest and poorest district
  • Butler: 3.0× between its richest and poorest district
  • Stark: 3.2× between its richest and poorest district
  • Defiance: 3.2× between its richest and poorest district
  • Summit: 3.3× between its richest and poorest district
  • Columbiana: 3.5× between its richest and poorest district
  • Athens: 3.8× between its richest and poorest district
  • Franklin: 3.9× between its richest and poorest district
  • Mahoning: 4.4× between its richest and poorest district
  • Lorain: 4.7× between its richest and poorest district
  • Lake: 4.7× between its richest and poorest district
  • Crawford: 4.9× between its richest and poorest district
  • Trumbull: 5.1× between its richest and poorest district
  • Montgomery: 5.3× between its richest and poorest district
  • Hamilton: 5.3× between its richest and poorest district
  • Cuyahoga: 5.5× between its richest and poorest district
  • Jefferson: 6.5× between its richest and poorest district
  • Ottawa: 7.4× between its richest and poorest district

Two districts in the same county, 1.4 times apart on the tax base each pupil stands on — $79,714 per pupil of assessed valuation. Every mill Van Wert City levies raises 0.73 of what the same mill raises in Lincolnview Local, which is the disparity DeRolph was brought over and the reason the formula has an equalization term at all.

The formula answers it here: Van Wert City receives $184 more state aid per pupil than Lincolnview Local. Whether that closes the gap is a different question from whether it points the right way — $79,714 of valuation per pupil is not repaired by $184 of aid. Statewide, 294 districts are held above their formula amount.

3 districts

DistrictPupils Valuation per pupil, FY2024 State aid per pupil Spending per pupil, FY2024Status
Crestview Local 833 $266,546 $6,700 $16,287 on formula
Lincolnview Local 813 $291,577 $6,245 $15,549 on formula
Van Wert City 1,734 $211,864 $6,429 $14,829 at the 20-mill floor

3,380 pupils across the districts listed, and that is a sum of these districts rather than a count of the county's children — Ohio school district boundaries cross county lines, so some of these pupils live elsewhere and some of the county's live in districts on another page. The department attributes each district to one county and this page inherits that attribution; it is a peer group, not a boundary.

Median state aid here is $6,429 per pupil, against $5,910 statewide. None is on the guarantee, which is unusual: 48% of Ohio districts are. 1 is at or below the 20-mill floor, where H.B. 920's reduction factors stop operating and a reappraisal raises revenue again.

Who gained, who lost

On total state support from FY2025 to FY2027, 0 of the 3 districts here rose and 3 fell. Every district here in the three years, on the measure selected. FY2025 is the department's final payment report; FY2026 and FY2027 are its models of those years, not payments. Changes are percentages of each district's own earlier year, so a city and a village read on one scale. Every figure is in nominal dollars.

FY2025 paid, FY2026 and FY2027 models

On total state support:

  • FY2025 to FY2026: of 3, 2 rose, 1 fell. Only Lincolnview Local fell.
  • FY2026 to FY2027: of 3, 0 rose, 3 fell.
  • FY2025 to FY2027: of 3, 0 rose, 3 fell.
Crestview LocalLincolnview LocalVan Wert City−1.3%−3.5%
Crestview LocalLincolnview LocalVan Wert City−1.3%−3.5%
Crestview LocalLincolnview LocalVan Wert City−1.3%−3.5%
The values
  • Crestview Local: −1.3% (−$84,161) in total state support, FY2025 to FY2027
  • Lincolnview Local: −2.3% (−$137,549) in total state support, FY2025 to FY2027
  • Van Wert City: −3.5% (−$449,511) in total state support, FY2025 to FY2027
Crestview Local $6,380,087$6,507,297$6,295,927 +2.0%
+$127,210
−3.2%
−$211,370
−1.3%
−$84,161
45.6% 39.7% Foundation aid
−$178,833
Lincolnview Local $5,924,682$5,886,486$5,787,133 −0.6%
−$38,196
−1.7%
−$99,354
−2.3%
−$137,549
42.3% 36.9% Foundation aid
−$249,179
Van Wert City $13,026,436$13,113,324$12,576,926 +0.7%
+$86,888
−4.1%
−$536,399
−3.5%
−$449,511
54.0% 49.0% Foundation aid
−$638,868

On foundation aid:

  • FY2025 to FY2026: of 3, 1 rose, 2 fell. Only Crestview Local rose.
  • FY2026 to FY2027: of 3, 0 rose, 3 fell.
  • FY2025 to FY2027: of 3, 0 rose, 3 fell.
Crestview LocalLincolnview LocalVan Wert City−3.1%−5.4%
Crestview LocalLincolnview LocalVan Wert City−3.1%−5.4%
Crestview LocalLincolnview LocalVan Wert City−3.1%−5.4%
The values
  • Crestview Local: −3.1% (−$178,833) in foundation aid, FY2025 to FY2027
  • Lincolnview Local: −4.7% (−$249,179) in foundation aid, FY2025 to FY2027
  • Van Wert City: −5.4% (−$638,868) in foundation aid, FY2025 to FY2027
Crestview Local $5,762,921$5,826,018$5,584,088 +1.1%
+$63,097
−4.2%
−$241,930
−3.1%
−$178,833
45.6% 39.7%
Lincolnview Local $5,327,580$5,208,842$5,078,401 −2.2%
−$118,739
−2.5%
−$130,441
−4.7%
−$249,179
42.3% 36.9%
Van Wert City $11,783,007$11,708,754$11,144,139 −0.6%
−$74,254
−4.8%
−$564,615
−5.4%
−$638,868
54.0% 49.0%

The two measures can disagree in sign. Total state support is every line the department pays a district through; foundation aid is core foundation funding and the guarantee alone, and a district held at its base does not move on it whatever its other lines do. Each district's name opens its change tab, which splits its own figures by line.

State share, from FY2026 to FY2027, falls in every district here. It is the part of base cost the state pays after a district's local capacity is charged, so it reaches the dollars through foundation aid; the FY2025 payment report does not publish it.

The same steps for every district in Ohio, one provision at a time — the supplement H.B. 96 repealed, the new count in DPIA, reappraisal through local capacity and the phase-in — are on What changed.

A district whose territory crosses a county line is filed under the one county the department assigns it, so it appears on that county's page and on no other.