Places › Counties

Stark County

17 districts · 50,087 pupils · 11 on the guarantee · 3 at the 20-mill floor · richest 3.2× the poorest

All 88 counties, ordered by that ratio. The median Ohio district receives $5,910 per pupil in state aid in FY2027.

The spread inside Stark County

Jackson Local stands on 3.2× Canton City's tax base per pupil: $328,459 against $102,388. Every district in the county by the assessed valuation each of its pupils stands on — one dot each, poorest on the left. The shaded box is the middle half of them.

$100K$300KOhio median $247,848Canton CityJackson Local
$100K$300KOhio median $247,848Canton CityJackson Local
$100K$300KOhio median $247,848Canton CityJackson Local
The values
  • Canton City: $102,388 per pupil, $11,042 state aid per pupil
  • Alliance City: $123,152 per pupil, $10,234 state aid per pupil
  • Massillon City: $138,718 per pupil, $9,339 state aid per pupil
  • Osnaburg Local: $160,612 per pupil, $8,820 state aid per pupil
  • Louisville City: $182,405 per pupil, $5,261 state aid per pupil
  • Minerva Local: $190,225 per pupil, $6,576 state aid per pupil
  • Lake Local: $198,663 per pupil, $4,633 state aid per pupil
  • Sandy Valley Local: $205,497 per pupil, $7,665 state aid per pupil
  • Perry Local: $212,562 per pupil, $4,790 state aid per pupil
  • North Canton City: $233,085 per pupil, $3,512 state aid per pupil
  • Plain Local: $233,623 per pupil, $3,435 state aid per pupil
  • Tuslaw Local: $249,836 per pupil, $4,296 state aid per pupil
  • Northwest Local: $261,135 per pupil, $5,091 state aid per pupil
  • Marlington Local: $287,513 per pupil, $5,022 state aid per pupil
  • Canton Local: $297,997 per pupil, $5,113 state aid per pupil
  • Fairless Local: $328,457 per pupil, $6,142 state aid per pupil
  • Jackson Local: $328,459 per pupil, $968 state aid per pupil
DistrictValuation per pupil State aid per pupilPupils
Jackson Local
The most property wealth per pupil here
$328,459 $968 5,708
Canton City
The least
$102,388 $11,042 7,089

These four figures are the headline; the full comparison puts the two side by side on every measure the panel carries.

Where that sits among the 84 counties with more than one district reporting a tax base — one dot each, narrowest on the left, and the rule marked Stark is this county. The median is 2.1× apart.

Richest over poorest district, tax base per pupil 3.2× 81st percentile
1.0×7.0×StarkMedian 2.1×
1.0×7.0×StarkMedian 2.1×
1.0×7.0×StarkMedian 2.1×
The values
  • Adams: 1.1× between its richest and poorest district
  • Carroll: 1.2× between its richest and poorest district
  • Auglaize: 1.2× between its richest and poorest district
  • Harrison: 1.2× between its richest and poorest district
  • Morrow: 1.3× between its richest and poorest district
  • Jackson: 1.3× between its richest and poorest district
  • Meigs: 1.4× between its richest and poorest district
  • Van Wert: 1.4× between its richest and poorest district
  • Preble: 1.4× between its richest and poorest district
  • Paulding: 1.5× between its richest and poorest district
  • Greene: 1.5× between its richest and poorest district
  • Champaign: 1.5× between its richest and poorest district
  • Huron: 1.5× between its richest and poorest district
  • Highland: 1.5× between its richest and poorest district
  • Mercer: 1.5× between its richest and poorest district
  • Pike: 1.6× between its richest and poorest district
  • Geauga: 1.6× between its richest and poorest district
  • Madison: 1.6× between its richest and poorest district
  • Putnam: 1.6× between its richest and poorest district
  • Medina: 1.6× between its richest and poorest district
  • Gallia: 1.7× between its richest and poorest district
  • Holmes: 1.7× between its richest and poorest district
  • Clinton: 1.7× between its richest and poorest district
  • Pickaway: 1.7× between its richest and poorest district
  • Union: 1.7× between its richest and poorest district
  • Henry: 1.7× between its richest and poorest district
  • Sandusky: 1.7× between its richest and poorest district
  • Darke: 1.8× between its richest and poorest district
  • Williams: 1.8× between its richest and poorest district
  • Shelby: 1.8× between its richest and poorest district
  • Guernsey: 1.8× between its richest and poorest district
  • Perry: 1.8× between its richest and poorest district
  • Ashtabula: 1.8× between its richest and poorest district
  • Warren: 1.8× between its richest and poorest district
  • Delaware: 1.9× between its richest and poorest district
  • Fayette: 1.9× between its richest and poorest district
  • Fulton: 2.0× between its richest and poorest district
  • Scioto: 2.0× between its richest and poorest district
  • Washington: 2.0× between its richest and poorest district
  • Clermont: 2.0× between its richest and poorest district
  • Hardin: 2.1× between its richest and poorest district
  • Wood: 2.1× between its richest and poorest district
  • Muskingum: 2.1× between its richest and poorest district
  • Brown: 2.1× between its richest and poorest district
  • Erie: 2.1× between its richest and poorest district
  • Tuscarawas: 2.2× between its richest and poorest district
  • Hancock: 2.3× between its richest and poorest district
  • Coshocton: 2.3× between its richest and poorest district
  • Clark: 2.3× between its richest and poorest district
  • Wyandot: 2.3× between its richest and poorest district
  • Richland: 2.4× between its richest and poorest district
  • Ashland: 2.4× between its richest and poorest district
  • Miami: 2.4× between its richest and poorest district
  • Lawrence: 2.4× between its richest and poorest district
  • Logan: 2.5× between its richest and poorest district
  • Belmont: 2.5× between its richest and poorest district
  • Knox: 2.5× between its richest and poorest district
  • Lucas: 2.6× between its richest and poorest district
  • Portage: 2.6× between its richest and poorest district
  • Ross: 2.6× between its richest and poorest district
  • Licking: 2.6× between its richest and poorest district
  • Marion: 2.6× between its richest and poorest district
  • Seneca: 2.7× between its richest and poorest district
  • Wayne: 2.8× between its richest and poorest district
  • Noble: 2.8× between its richest and poorest district
  • Fairfield: 2.9× between its richest and poorest district
  • Allen: 3.0× between its richest and poorest district
  • Butler: 3.0× between its richest and poorest district
  • Stark: 3.2× between its richest and poorest district
  • Defiance: 3.2× between its richest and poorest district
  • Summit: 3.3× between its richest and poorest district
  • Columbiana: 3.5× between its richest and poorest district
  • Athens: 3.8× between its richest and poorest district
  • Franklin: 3.9× between its richest and poorest district
  • Mahoning: 4.4× between its richest and poorest district
  • Lorain: 4.7× between its richest and poorest district
  • Lake: 4.7× between its richest and poorest district
  • Crawford: 4.9× between its richest and poorest district
  • Trumbull: 5.1× between its richest and poorest district
  • Montgomery: 5.3× between its richest and poorest district
  • Hamilton: 5.3× between its richest and poorest district
  • Cuyahoga: 5.5× between its richest and poorest district
  • Jefferson: 6.5× between its richest and poorest district
  • Ottawa: 7.4× between its richest and poorest district

Two districts in the same county, 3.2 times apart on the tax base each pupil stands on — $226,071 per pupil of assessed valuation. Every mill Canton City levies raises 0.31 of what the same mill raises in Jackson Local, which is the disparity DeRolph was brought over and the reason the formula has an equalization term at all.

The formula answers it here: Canton City receives $10,073 more state aid per pupil than Jackson Local. Whether that closes the gap is a different question from whether it points the right way — $226,071 of valuation per pupil is not repaired by $10,073 of aid. Statewide, 294 districts are held above their formula amount.

17 districts

DistrictPupils Valuation per pupil, FY2024 State aid per pupil Spending per pupil, FY2024Status
Alliance City 2,589 $123,152 $10,234 $18,565 on formula
Canton City 7,089 $102,388 $11,042 $21,751 on formula
Canton Local 1,600 $297,997 $5,113 $19,320 on the guarantee · at the 20-mill floor
Fairless Local 1,230 $328,457 $6,142 $15,774 on the guarantee
Jackson Local 5,708 $328,459 $968 $12,570 at the minimum state share
Lake Local 3,240 $198,663 $4,633 $12,489 on the guarantee
Louisville City 2,654 $182,405 $5,261 $12,880 on formula
Marlington Local 1,812 $287,513 $5,022 $15,472 on the guarantee · at the 20-mill floor
Massillon City 3,900 $138,718 $9,339 $14,669 on formula
Minerva Local 1,615 $190,225 $6,576 $14,459 on the guarantee
North Canton City 4,093 $233,085 $3,512 $14,225 on the guarantee
Northwest Local 1,626 $261,135 $5,091 $13,678 on the guarantee
Osnaburg Local 846 $160,612 $8,820 $13,399 at the 20-mill floor
Perry Local 3,965 $212,562 $4,790 $13,491 on the guarantee
Plain Local 5,653 $233,623 $3,435 $12,454 on the guarantee
Sandy Valley Local 1,222 $205,497 $7,665 $15,187 on the guarantee
Tuslaw Local 1,247 $249,836 $4,296 $12,642 on the guarantee

50,087 pupils across the districts listed, and that is a sum of these districts rather than a count of the county's children — Ohio school district boundaries cross county lines, so some of these pupils live elsewhere and some of the county's live in districts on another page. The department attributes each district to one county and this page inherits that attribution; it is a peer group, not a boundary.

Median state aid here is $5,113 per pupil, against $5,910 statewide. 11 of 17 are on the guarantee, against 48% of the state. 3 are at or below the 20-mill floor, where H.B. 920's reduction factors stop operating and a reappraisal raises revenue again.

Who gained, who lost

On total state support from FY2025 to FY2027, 8 of the 17 districts here rose and 9 fell. Every district here in the three years, on the measure selected. FY2025 is the department's final payment report; FY2026 and FY2027 are its models of those years, not payments. Changes are percentages of each district's own earlier year, so a city and a village read on one scale. Every figure is in nominal dollars.

FY2025 paid, FY2026 and FY2027 models

On total state support:

  • FY2025 to FY2026: of 17, 9 rose, 8 fell.
  • FY2026 to FY2027: of 17, 10 rose, 7 fell.
  • FY2025 to FY2027: of 17, 8 rose, 9 fell.
Jackson LocalMassillon CityNorth Canton CityTuslaw LocalNorthwest LocalAlliance CityMarlington LocalFairless LocalOsnaburg LocalLake LocalSandy Valley LocalPerry LocalMinerva LocalCanton CityPlain LocalCanton LocalLouisville City+14.3%−10.5%
Jackson LocalMassillon CityNorth Canton CityTuslaw LocalNorthwest LocalAlliance CityMarlington LocalFairless LocalOsnaburg LocalLake LocalSandy Valley LocalPerry LocalMinerva LocalCanton CityPlain LocalCanton LocalLouisville City+14.3%−10.5%
Jackson LocalMassillon CityNorth Canton CityTuslaw LocalNorthwest LocalAlliance CityMarlington LocalFairless LocalOsnaburg LocalLake LocalSandy Valley LocalPerry LocalMinerva LocalCanton CityPlain LocalCanton LocalLouisville City+14.3%−10.5%
The values
  • Jackson Local: +14.3% (+$1,122,051) in total state support, FY2025 to FY2027
  • Massillon City: +5.6% (+$2,098,357) in total state support, FY2025 to FY2027
  • North Canton City: +4.7% (+$755,032) in total state support, FY2025 to FY2027
  • Tuslaw Local: +4.5% (+$266,656) in total state support, FY2025 to FY2027
  • Northwest Local: +4.1% (+$369,958) in total state support, FY2025 to FY2027
  • Alliance City: +2.3% (+$658,134) in total state support, FY2025 to FY2027
  • Marlington Local: +0.9% (+$92,056) in total state support, FY2025 to FY2027
  • Fairless Local: +0.7% (+$64,415) in total state support, FY2025 to FY2027
  • Osnaburg Local: −0.3% (−$21,901) in total state support, FY2025 to FY2027
  • Lake Local: −0.6% (−$102,993) in total state support, FY2025 to FY2027
  • Sandy Valley Local: −3.1% (−$341,301) in total state support, FY2025 to FY2027
  • Perry Local: −4.5% (−$1,041,479) in total state support, FY2025 to FY2027
  • Minerva Local: −4.8% (−$625,127) in total state support, FY2025 to FY2027
  • Canton City: −5.4% (−$4,980,631) in total state support, FY2025 to FY2027
  • Plain Local: −6.0% (−$1,528,557) in total state support, FY2025 to FY2027
  • Canton Local: −7.5% (−$759,091) in total state support, FY2025 to FY2027
  • Louisville City: −10.5% (−$1,840,159) in total state support, FY2025 to FY2027
Jackson Local $7,856,611$8,763,448$8,978,663 +11.5%
+$906,836
+2.5%
+$215,215
+14.3%
+$1,122,051
10.0% 10.0%
the minimum
Transportation
+$503,818
Massillon City $37,187,924$38,028,847$39,286,281 +2.3%
+$840,923
+3.3%
+$1,257,433
+5.6%
+$2,098,357
67.3% 64.8% Foundation aid
+$1,908,594
North Canton City $16,037,623$16,632,917$16,792,654 +3.7%
+$595,295
+1.0%
+$159,737
+4.7%
+$755,032
24.9% 18.6% Transportation
+$337,644
Tuslaw Local $5,955,639$6,145,782$6,222,294 +3.2%
+$190,143
+1.2%
+$76,512
+4.5%
+$266,656
24.6% 15.6% Transportation
+$115,519
Northwest Local $9,101,202$9,364,942$9,471,160 +2.9%
+$263,740
+1.1%
+$106,218
+4.1%
+$369,958
24.5% 16.7% Transportation
+$189,376
Alliance City $28,125,583$28,520,096$28,783,717 +1.4%
+$394,514
+0.9%
+$263,621
+2.3%
+$658,134
72.5% 69.8% Foundation aid
+$472,026
Marlington Local $10,769,157$10,886,817$10,861,212 +1.1%
+$117,661
−0.2%
−$25,605
+0.9%
+$92,056
23.6% 16.3% Transportation
+$174,968
Fairless Local $8,601,357$8,663,874$8,665,773 +0.7%
+$62,517
+<0.1%
+$1,898
+0.7%
+$64,415
20.0% 12.0% Formula transition supplement
−$113,502
Osnaburg Local $8,165,715$8,193,253$8,143,814 +0.3%
+$27,538
−0.6%
−$49,439
−0.3%
−$21,901
53.2% 47.7% Transportation
−$48,590
Lake Local $17,329,127$17,151,614$17,226,134 −1.0%
−$177,513
+0.4%
+$74,520
−0.6%
−$102,993
36.4% 30.7% Foundation aid
−$847,318
Sandy Valley Local $11,068,337$10,754,518$10,727,035 −2.8%
−$313,818
−0.3%
−$27,483
−3.1%
−$341,301
50.3% 45.8% Foundation aid
−$462,839
Perry Local $22,919,287$22,392,636$21,877,808 −2.3%
−$526,651
−2.3%
−$514,828
−4.5%
−$1,041,479
41.9% 35.6% Foundation aid
−$1,713,407
Minerva Local $13,050,930$12,728,250$12,425,803 −2.5%
−$322,680
−2.4%
−$302,447
−4.8%
−$625,127
51.6% 46.2% Foundation aid
−$1,223,323
Canton City $92,242,569$87,999,609$87,261,939 −4.6%
−$4,242,960
−0.8%
−$737,670
−5.4%
−$4,980,631
79.8% 77.1% Supplemental targeted assistance (repealed by H.B. 96)
−$4,365,481
Plain Local $25,574,191$23,865,365$24,045,634 −6.7%
−$1,708,826
+0.8%
+$180,269
−6.0%
−$1,528,557
29.8% 22.6% Foundation aid
−$3,622,862
Canton Local $10,148,226$9,348,644$9,389,135 −7.9%
−$799,582
+0.4%
+$40,490
−7.5%
−$759,091
34.4% 27.9% Foundation aid
−$1,046,548
Louisville City $17,453,635$16,745,186$15,613,477 −4.1%
−$708,449
−6.8%
−$1,131,710
−10.5%
−$1,840,159
42.3% 37.6% Foundation aid
−$2,259,970

On foundation aid:

  • FY2025 to FY2026: of 17, 3 rose, 9 fell, 5 did not move. The 3 that rose: Alliance City, Jackson Local and Massillon City.
  • FY2026 to FY2027: of 17, 3 rose, 6 fell, 8 did not move. The 3 that rose: Alliance City, Massillon City and Osnaburg Local.
  • FY2025 to FY2027: of 17, 2 rose, 10 fell, 5 did not move. The 2 that rose: Alliance City and Massillon City.
Massillon CityAlliance CityFairless LocalMarlington LocalNorth Canton CityNorthwest LocalTuslaw LocalOsnaburg LocalJackson LocalCanton CitySandy Valley LocalLake LocalPerry LocalMinerva LocalCanton LocalLouisville CityPlain Local+5.5%−15.7%
Massillon CityAlliance CityFairless LocalMarlington LocalNorth Canton CityNorthwest LocalTuslaw LocalOsnaburg LocalJackson LocalCanton CitySandy Valley LocalLake LocalPerry LocalMinerva LocalCanton LocalLouisville CityPlain Local+5.5%−15.7%
Massillon CityAlliance CityFairless LocalMarlington LocalNorth Canton CityNorthwest LocalTuslaw LocalOsnaburg LocalJackson LocalCanton CitySandy Valley LocalLake LocalPerry LocalMinerva LocalCanton LocalLouisville CityPlain Local+5.5%−15.7%
The values
  • Massillon City: +5.5% (+$1,908,594) in foundation aid, FY2025 to FY2027
  • Alliance City: +1.8% (+$472,026) in foundation aid, FY2025 to FY2027
  • Fairless Local: 0.0% ($0) in foundation aid, FY2025 to FY2027
  • Marlington Local: 0.0% ($0) in foundation aid, FY2025 to FY2027
  • North Canton City: 0.0% ($0) in foundation aid, FY2025 to FY2027
  • Northwest Local: 0.0% ($0) in foundation aid, FY2025 to FY2027
  • Tuslaw Local: 0.0% ($0) in foundation aid, FY2025 to FY2027
  • Osnaburg Local: −0.3% (−$26,010) in foundation aid, FY2025 to FY2027
  • Jackson Local: −0.5% (−$25,095) in foundation aid, FY2025 to FY2027
  • Canton City: −2.0% (−$1,613,511) in foundation aid, FY2025 to FY2027
  • Sandy Valley Local: −4.7% (−$462,839) in foundation aid, FY2025 to FY2027
  • Lake Local: −5.3% (−$847,318) in foundation aid, FY2025 to FY2027
  • Perry Local: −8.3% (−$1,713,407) in foundation aid, FY2025 to FY2027
  • Minerva Local: −10.3% (−$1,223,323) in foundation aid, FY2025 to FY2027
  • Canton Local: −11.3% (−$1,046,548) in foundation aid, FY2025 to FY2027
  • Louisville City: −13.9% (−$2,259,970) in foundation aid, FY2025 to FY2027
  • Plain Local: −15.7% (−$3,622,862) in foundation aid, FY2025 to FY2027
Massillon City $34,510,875$35,210,149$36,419,469 +2.0%
+$699,274
+3.4%
+$1,209,320
+5.5%
+$1,908,594
67.3% 64.8%
Alliance City $26,018,590$26,261,574$26,490,615 +0.9%
+$242,985
+0.9%
+$229,041
+1.8%
+$472,026
72.5% 69.8%
Fairless Local $7,554,963$7,554,963$7,554,963 0.0%
$0
0.0%
$0
0.0%
$0
20.0% 12.0%
Marlington Local $9,101,754$9,101,754$9,101,754 0.0%
$0
0.0%
$0
0.0%
$0
23.6% 16.3%
North Canton City $14,375,386$14,375,386$14,375,386 0.0%
$0
0.0%
$0
0.0%
$0
24.9% 18.6%
Northwest Local $8,279,286$8,279,286$8,279,286 0.0%
$0
0.0%
$0
0.0%
$0
24.5% 16.7%
Tuslaw Local $5,357,952$5,357,952$5,357,952 0.0%
$0
0.0%
$0
0.0%
$0
24.6% 15.6%
Osnaburg Local $7,488,880$7,452,096$7,462,870 −0.5%
−$36,783
+0.1%
+$10,773
−0.3%
−$26,010
53.2% 47.7%
Jackson Local $5,552,363$5,574,496$5,527,268 +0.4%
+$22,133
−0.8%
−$47,228
−0.5%
−$25,095
10.0% 10.0%
the minimum
Canton City $79,889,937$79,140,853$78,276,426 −0.9%
−$749,084
−1.1%
−$864,427
−2.0%
−$1,613,511
79.8% 77.1%
Sandy Valley Local $9,825,966$9,363,127$9,363,127 −4.7%
−$462,839
0.0%
$0
−4.7%
−$462,839
50.3% 45.8%
Lake Local $15,857,023$15,009,705$15,009,705 −5.3%
−$847,318
0.0%
$0
−5.3%
−$847,318
36.4% 30.7%
Perry Local $20,707,190$19,759,637$18,993,782 −4.6%
−$947,553
−3.9%
−$765,854
−8.3%
−$1,713,407
41.9% 35.6%
Minerva Local $11,840,660$11,380,474$10,617,337 −3.9%
−$460,186
−6.7%
−$763,138
−10.3%
−$1,223,323
51.6% 46.2%
Canton Local $9,225,706$8,179,159$8,179,159 −11.3%
−$1,046,548
0.0%
$0
−11.3%
−$1,046,548
34.4% 27.9%
Louisville City $16,221,771$15,246,317$13,961,802 −6.0%
−$975,455
−8.4%
−$1,284,515
−13.9%
−$2,259,970
42.3% 37.6%
Plain Local $23,036,945$20,298,112$19,414,084 −11.9%
−$2,738,833
−4.4%
−$884,029
−15.7%
−$3,622,862
29.8% 22.6%

The two measures can disagree in sign. Total state support is every line the department pays a district through; foundation aid is core foundation funding and the guarantee alone, and a district held at its base does not move on it whatever its other lines do. Each district's name opens its change tab, which splits its own figures by line.

Without supplemental targeted assistance, which H.B. 96 repealed after FY2025, total state support from FY2025 to FY2026 moved: Canton City +0.1% ($4,365,481 of it in FY2025). That district's first step on total state support carries the whole supplement as a loss; this is what the rest of the payment did.

State share, from FY2026 to FY2027, falls in 16 of the 17 districts here. Jackson Local is at the formula's minimum state share in FY2027. It is the part of base cost the state pays after a district's local capacity is charged, so it reaches the dollars through foundation aid; the FY2025 payment report does not publish it.

The same steps for every district in Ohio, one provision at a time — the supplement H.B. 96 repealed, the new count in DPIA, reappraisal through local capacity and the phase-in — are on What changed.

A district whose territory crosses a county line is filed under the one county the department assigns it, so it appears on that county's page and on no other.