Places › Counties
Sandusky County
5 districts · 7,289 pupils · 3 on the guarantee · 3 at the 20-mill floor · richest 1.7× the poorest
All 88 counties, ordered by that ratio. The median Ohio district receives $5,910 per pupil in state aid in FY2027.
The spread inside Sandusky County
Lakota Local stands on 1.7× Clyde-Green Springs Exempted Village's tax base per pupil: $271,691 against $157,108. Every district in the county by the assessed valuation each of its pupils stands on — one dot each, poorest on the left.
The values
- Clyde-Green Springs Exempted Village: $157,108 per pupil, $6,851 state aid per pupil
- Gibsonburg Exempted Village: $218,443 per pupil, $8,140 state aid per pupil
- Woodmore Local: $259,884 per pupil, $4,716 state aid per pupil
- Fremont City: $262,050 per pupil, $5,068 state aid per pupil
- Lakota Local: $271,691 per pupil, $5,855 state aid per pupil
| District | Valuation per pupil | State aid per pupil | Pupils |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lakota Local The most property wealth per pupil here |
$271,691 | $5,855 | 853 |
| Clyde-Green Springs Exempted Village The least |
$157,108 | $6,851 | 1,812 |
These four figures are the headline; the full comparison puts the two side by side on every measure the panel carries.
Where that sits among the 84 counties with more than one district reporting a tax base — one dot each, narrowest on the left, and the rule marked Sandusky is this county. The median is 2.1× apart.
The values
- Adams: 1.1× between its richest and poorest district
- Carroll: 1.2× between its richest and poorest district
- Auglaize: 1.2× between its richest and poorest district
- Harrison: 1.2× between its richest and poorest district
- Morrow: 1.3× between its richest and poorest district
- Jackson: 1.3× between its richest and poorest district
- Meigs: 1.4× between its richest and poorest district
- Van Wert: 1.4× between its richest and poorest district
- Preble: 1.4× between its richest and poorest district
- Paulding: 1.5× between its richest and poorest district
- Greene: 1.5× between its richest and poorest district
- Champaign: 1.5× between its richest and poorest district
- Huron: 1.5× between its richest and poorest district
- Highland: 1.5× between its richest and poorest district
- Mercer: 1.5× between its richest and poorest district
- Pike: 1.6× between its richest and poorest district
- Geauga: 1.6× between its richest and poorest district
- Madison: 1.6× between its richest and poorest district
- Putnam: 1.6× between its richest and poorest district
- Medina: 1.6× between its richest and poorest district
- Gallia: 1.7× between its richest and poorest district
- Holmes: 1.7× between its richest and poorest district
- Clinton: 1.7× between its richest and poorest district
- Pickaway: 1.7× between its richest and poorest district
- Union: 1.7× between its richest and poorest district
- Henry: 1.7× between its richest and poorest district
- Sandusky: 1.7× between its richest and poorest district
- Darke: 1.8× between its richest and poorest district
- Williams: 1.8× between its richest and poorest district
- Shelby: 1.8× between its richest and poorest district
- Guernsey: 1.8× between its richest and poorest district
- Perry: 1.8× between its richest and poorest district
- Ashtabula: 1.8× between its richest and poorest district
- Warren: 1.8× between its richest and poorest district
- Delaware: 1.9× between its richest and poorest district
- Fayette: 1.9× between its richest and poorest district
- Fulton: 2.0× between its richest and poorest district
- Scioto: 2.0× between its richest and poorest district
- Washington: 2.0× between its richest and poorest district
- Clermont: 2.0× between its richest and poorest district
- Hardin: 2.1× between its richest and poorest district
- Wood: 2.1× between its richest and poorest district
- Muskingum: 2.1× between its richest and poorest district
- Brown: 2.1× between its richest and poorest district
- Erie: 2.1× between its richest and poorest district
- Tuscarawas: 2.2× between its richest and poorest district
- Hancock: 2.3× between its richest and poorest district
- Coshocton: 2.3× between its richest and poorest district
- Clark: 2.3× between its richest and poorest district
- Wyandot: 2.3× between its richest and poorest district
- Richland: 2.4× between its richest and poorest district
- Ashland: 2.4× between its richest and poorest district
- Miami: 2.4× between its richest and poorest district
- Lawrence: 2.4× between its richest and poorest district
- Logan: 2.5× between its richest and poorest district
- Belmont: 2.5× between its richest and poorest district
- Knox: 2.5× between its richest and poorest district
- Lucas: 2.6× between its richest and poorest district
- Portage: 2.6× between its richest and poorest district
- Ross: 2.6× between its richest and poorest district
- Licking: 2.6× between its richest and poorest district
- Marion: 2.6× between its richest and poorest district
- Seneca: 2.7× between its richest and poorest district
- Wayne: 2.8× between its richest and poorest district
- Noble: 2.8× between its richest and poorest district
- Fairfield: 2.9× between its richest and poorest district
- Allen: 3.0× between its richest and poorest district
- Butler: 3.0× between its richest and poorest district
- Stark: 3.2× between its richest and poorest district
- Defiance: 3.2× between its richest and poorest district
- Summit: 3.3× between its richest and poorest district
- Columbiana: 3.5× between its richest and poorest district
- Athens: 3.8× between its richest and poorest district
- Franklin: 3.9× between its richest and poorest district
- Mahoning: 4.4× between its richest and poorest district
- Lorain: 4.7× between its richest and poorest district
- Lake: 4.7× between its richest and poorest district
- Crawford: 4.9× between its richest and poorest district
- Trumbull: 5.1× between its richest and poorest district
- Montgomery: 5.3× between its richest and poorest district
- Hamilton: 5.3× between its richest and poorest district
- Cuyahoga: 5.5× between its richest and poorest district
- Jefferson: 6.5× between its richest and poorest district
- Ottawa: 7.4× between its richest and poorest district
Two districts in the same county, 1.7 times apart on the tax base each pupil stands on — $114,583 per pupil of assessed valuation. Every mill Clyde-Green Springs Exempted Village levies raises 0.58 of what the same mill raises in Lakota Local, which is the disparity DeRolph was brought over and the reason the formula has an equalization term at all.
The formula answers it here: Clyde-Green Springs Exempted Village receives $996 more state aid per pupil than Lakota Local. Whether that closes the gap is a different question from whether it points the right way — $114,583 of valuation per pupil is not repaired by $996 of aid. Statewide, 294 districts are held above their formula amount.
5 districts
| District | Pupils | Valuation per pupil, FY2024 | State aid per pupil | Spending per pupil, FY2024 | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clyde-Green Springs Exempted Village | 1,812 | $157,108 | $6,851 | $15,044 | on formula |
| Fremont City | 3,098 | $262,050 | $5,068 | $14,778 | at the 20-mill floor |
| Gibsonburg Exempted Village | 658 | $218,443 | $8,140 | $16,190 | on the guarantee · at the 20-mill floor |
| Lakota Local | 853 | $271,691 | $5,855 | $15,793 | on the guarantee · at the 20-mill floor |
| Woodmore Local | 868 | $259,884 | $4,716 | $13,598 | on the guarantee |
7,289 pupils across the districts listed, and that is a sum of these districts rather than a count of the county's children — Ohio school district boundaries cross county lines, so some of these pupils live elsewhere and some of the county's live in districts on another page. The department attributes each district to one county and this page inherits that attribution; it is a peer group, not a boundary.
Median state aid here is $5,855 per pupil, against $5,910 statewide. 3 of 5 are on the guarantee, against 48% of the state. 3 are at or below the 20-mill floor, where H.B. 920's reduction factors stop operating and a reappraisal raises revenue again.
Who gained, who lost
On total state support from FY2025 to FY2027, 2 of the 5 districts here rose and 3 fell. Every district here in the three years, on the measure selected. FY2025 is the department's final payment report; FY2026 and FY2027 are its models of those years, not payments. Changes are percentages of each district's own earlier year, so a city and a village read on one scale. Every figure is in nominal dollars.
On total state support:
- FY2025 to FY2026: of 5, 2 rose, 3 fell. The 2 that rose: Gibsonburg Exempted Village and Woodmore Local.
- FY2026 to FY2027: of 5, 3 rose, 2 fell. The 2 that fell: Clyde-Green Springs Exempted Village and Fremont City.
- FY2025 to FY2027: of 5, 2 rose, 3 fell. The 2 that rose: Gibsonburg Exempted Village and Woodmore Local.
The values
- Woodmore Local: +4.7% (+$236,187) in total state support, FY2025 to FY2027
- Gibsonburg Exempted Village: +0.6% (+$36,498) in total state support, FY2025 to FY2027
- Lakota Local: −0.3% (−$18,610) in total state support, FY2025 to FY2027
- Fremont City: −4.8% (−$931,655) in total state support, FY2025 to FY2027
- Clyde-Green Springs Exempted Village: −4.9% (−$723,454) in total state support, FY2025 to FY2027
| Woodmore Local | $4,984,142 | $5,163,327 | $5,220,329 | +3.6% +$179,186 | +1.1% +$57,001 | +4.7% +$236,187 |
26.6% | 22.0% | Transportation +$142,380 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gibsonburg Exempted Village | $5,825,090 | $5,847,898 | $5,861,589 | +0.4% +$22,808 | +0.2% +$13,691 | +0.6% +$36,498 |
45.5% | 39.5% | Formula transition supplement +$92,195 |
| Lakota Local | $6,113,948 | $6,089,873 | $6,095,337 | −0.4% −$24,075 | +0.1% +$5,464 | −0.3% −$18,610 |
36.5% | 29.1% | Foundation aid −$302,844 |
| Fremont City | $19,284,423 | $19,214,661 | $18,352,769 | −0.4% −$69,762 | −4.5% −$861,892 | −4.8% −$931,655 |
40.1% | 34.9% | Foundation aid −$1,465,414 |
| Clyde-Green Springs Exempted Village | $14,834,516 | $14,771,548 | $14,111,061 | −0.4% −$62,968 | −4.5% −$660,486 | −4.9% −$723,454 |
58.1% | 54.0% | Foundation aid −$744,902 |
On foundation aid:
- FY2025 to FY2026: of 5, 0 rose, 4 fell, 1 did not move.
- FY2026 to FY2027: of 5, 0 rose, 2 fell, 3 did not move.
- FY2025 to FY2027: of 5, 0 rose, 4 fell, 1 did not move.
The values
- Woodmore Local: 0.0% ($0) in foundation aid, FY2025 to FY2027
- Gibsonburg Exempted Village: −1.7% (−$91,631) in foundation aid, FY2025 to FY2027
- Clyde-Green Springs Exempted Village: −5.7% (−$744,902) in foundation aid, FY2025 to FY2027
- Lakota Local: −5.7% (−$302,844) in foundation aid, FY2025 to FY2027
- Fremont City: −8.5% (−$1,465,414) in foundation aid, FY2025 to FY2027
| Woodmore Local | $4,095,653 | $4,095,653 | $4,095,653 | 0.0% $0 | 0.0% $0 | 0.0% $0 |
26.6% | 22.0% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gibsonburg Exempted Village | $5,451,283 | $5,359,653 | $5,359,653 | −1.7% −$91,631 | 0.0% $0 | −1.7% −$91,631 |
45.5% | 39.5% |
| Clyde-Green Springs Exempted Village | $13,155,110 | $12,938,861 | $12,410,208 | −1.6% −$216,249 | −4.1% −$528,653 | −5.7% −$744,902 |
58.1% | 54.0% |
| Lakota Local | $5,296,771 | $4,993,928 | $4,993,928 | −5.7% −$302,844 | 0.0% $0 | −5.7% −$302,844 |
36.5% | 29.1% |
| Fremont City | $17,166,926 | $16,711,110 | $15,701,512 | −2.7% −$455,816 | −6.0% −$1,009,598 | −8.5% −$1,465,414 |
40.1% | 34.9% |
The two measures can disagree in sign. Total state support is every line the department pays a district through; foundation aid is core foundation funding and the guarantee alone, and a district held at its base does not move on it whatever its other lines do. Each district's name opens its change tab, which splits its own figures by line.
State share, from FY2026 to FY2027, falls in every district here. It is the part of base cost the state pays after a district's local capacity is charged, so it reaches the dollars through foundation aid; the FY2025 payment report does not publish it.
The same steps for every district in Ohio, one provision at a time — the supplement H.B. 96 repealed, the new count in DPIA, reappraisal through local capacity and the phase-in — are on What changed.
A district whose territory crosses a county line is filed under the one county the department assigns it, so it appears on that county's page and on no other.