Places › Counties

Meigs County

3 districts · 2,827 pupils · 3 at the 20-mill floor · richest 1.4× the poorest

All 88 counties, ordered by that ratio. The median Ohio district receives $5,910 per pupil in state aid in FY2027.

The spread inside Meigs County

Southern Local stands on 1.4× Meigs Local's tax base per pupil: $192,530 against $142,171. Every district in the county by the assessed valuation each of its pupils stands on — one dot each, poorest on the left.

$140K$240KOhio median $247,848Meigs LocalSouthern Local
$140K$240KOhio median $247,848Meigs LocalSouthern Local
$140K$240KOhio median $247,848Meigs LocalSouthern Local
The values
  • Meigs Local: $142,171 per pupil, $10,942 state aid per pupil
  • Eastern Local: $176,724 per pupil, $11,153 state aid per pupil
  • Southern Local: $192,530 per pupil, $11,872 state aid per pupil
DistrictValuation per pupil State aid per pupilPupils
Southern Local
The most property wealth per pupil here
$192,530 $11,872 643
Meigs Local
The least
$142,171 $10,942 1,473

These four figures are the headline; the full comparison puts the two side by side on every measure the panel carries.

Where that sits among the 84 counties with more than one district reporting a tax base — one dot each, narrowest on the left, and the rule marked Meigs is this county. The median is 2.1× apart.

Richest over poorest district, tax base per pupil 1.4× 7th percentile
1.0×7.0×MeigsMedian 2.1×
1.0×7.0×MeigsMedian 2.1×
1.0×7.0×MeigsMedian 2.1×
The values
  • Adams: 1.1× between its richest and poorest district
  • Carroll: 1.2× between its richest and poorest district
  • Auglaize: 1.2× between its richest and poorest district
  • Harrison: 1.2× between its richest and poorest district
  • Morrow: 1.3× between its richest and poorest district
  • Jackson: 1.3× between its richest and poorest district
  • Meigs: 1.4× between its richest and poorest district
  • Van Wert: 1.4× between its richest and poorest district
  • Preble: 1.4× between its richest and poorest district
  • Paulding: 1.5× between its richest and poorest district
  • Greene: 1.5× between its richest and poorest district
  • Champaign: 1.5× between its richest and poorest district
  • Huron: 1.5× between its richest and poorest district
  • Highland: 1.5× between its richest and poorest district
  • Mercer: 1.5× between its richest and poorest district
  • Pike: 1.6× between its richest and poorest district
  • Geauga: 1.6× between its richest and poorest district
  • Madison: 1.6× between its richest and poorest district
  • Putnam: 1.6× between its richest and poorest district
  • Medina: 1.6× between its richest and poorest district
  • Gallia: 1.7× between its richest and poorest district
  • Holmes: 1.7× between its richest and poorest district
  • Clinton: 1.7× between its richest and poorest district
  • Pickaway: 1.7× between its richest and poorest district
  • Union: 1.7× between its richest and poorest district
  • Henry: 1.7× between its richest and poorest district
  • Sandusky: 1.7× between its richest and poorest district
  • Darke: 1.8× between its richest and poorest district
  • Williams: 1.8× between its richest and poorest district
  • Shelby: 1.8× between its richest and poorest district
  • Guernsey: 1.8× between its richest and poorest district
  • Perry: 1.8× between its richest and poorest district
  • Ashtabula: 1.8× between its richest and poorest district
  • Warren: 1.8× between its richest and poorest district
  • Delaware: 1.9× between its richest and poorest district
  • Fayette: 1.9× between its richest and poorest district
  • Fulton: 2.0× between its richest and poorest district
  • Scioto: 2.0× between its richest and poorest district
  • Washington: 2.0× between its richest and poorest district
  • Clermont: 2.0× between its richest and poorest district
  • Hardin: 2.1× between its richest and poorest district
  • Wood: 2.1× between its richest and poorest district
  • Muskingum: 2.1× between its richest and poorest district
  • Brown: 2.1× between its richest and poorest district
  • Erie: 2.1× between its richest and poorest district
  • Tuscarawas: 2.2× between its richest and poorest district
  • Hancock: 2.3× between its richest and poorest district
  • Coshocton: 2.3× between its richest and poorest district
  • Clark: 2.3× between its richest and poorest district
  • Wyandot: 2.3× between its richest and poorest district
  • Richland: 2.4× between its richest and poorest district
  • Ashland: 2.4× between its richest and poorest district
  • Miami: 2.4× between its richest and poorest district
  • Lawrence: 2.4× between its richest and poorest district
  • Logan: 2.5× between its richest and poorest district
  • Belmont: 2.5× between its richest and poorest district
  • Knox: 2.5× between its richest and poorest district
  • Lucas: 2.6× between its richest and poorest district
  • Portage: 2.6× between its richest and poorest district
  • Ross: 2.6× between its richest and poorest district
  • Licking: 2.6× between its richest and poorest district
  • Marion: 2.6× between its richest and poorest district
  • Seneca: 2.7× between its richest and poorest district
  • Wayne: 2.8× between its richest and poorest district
  • Noble: 2.8× between its richest and poorest district
  • Fairfield: 2.9× between its richest and poorest district
  • Allen: 3.0× between its richest and poorest district
  • Butler: 3.0× between its richest and poorest district
  • Stark: 3.2× between its richest and poorest district
  • Defiance: 3.2× between its richest and poorest district
  • Summit: 3.3× between its richest and poorest district
  • Columbiana: 3.5× between its richest and poorest district
  • Athens: 3.8× between its richest and poorest district
  • Franklin: 3.9× between its richest and poorest district
  • Mahoning: 4.4× between its richest and poorest district
  • Lorain: 4.7× between its richest and poorest district
  • Lake: 4.7× between its richest and poorest district
  • Crawford: 4.9× between its richest and poorest district
  • Trumbull: 5.1× between its richest and poorest district
  • Montgomery: 5.3× between its richest and poorest district
  • Hamilton: 5.3× between its richest and poorest district
  • Cuyahoga: 5.5× between its richest and poorest district
  • Jefferson: 6.5× between its richest and poorest district
  • Ottawa: 7.4× between its richest and poorest district

Two districts in the same county, 1.4 times apart on the tax base each pupil stands on — $50,359 per pupil of assessed valuation. Every mill Meigs Local levies raises 0.74 of what the same mill raises in Southern Local, which is the disparity DeRolph was brought over and the reason the formula has an equalization term at all.

The formula does not answer it here. Southern Local has the larger tax base and receives $930 more state aid per pupil than Meigs Local. That is usually the guarantee, which holds a district at a historical amount regardless of what the formula now computes: neither district here is on it, so the cause is elsewhere — most often a difference in enrollment trend or in the categorical mix. Statewide, 294 districts are held above their formula amount.

3 districts

DistrictPupils Valuation per pupil, FY2024 State aid per pupil Spending per pupil, FY2024Status
Eastern Local 711 $176,724 $11,153 $15,133 at the 20-mill floor
Meigs Local 1,473 $142,171 $10,942 $18,419 at the 20-mill floor
Southern Local 643 $192,530 $11,872 $15,680 at the 20-mill floor

2,827 pupils across the districts listed, and that is a sum of these districts rather than a count of the county's children — Ohio school district boundaries cross county lines, so some of these pupils live elsewhere and some of the county's live in districts on another page. The department attributes each district to one county and this page inherits that attribution; it is a peer group, not a boundary.

Median state aid here is $11,153 per pupil, against $5,910 statewide. None is on the guarantee, which is unusual: 48% of Ohio districts are. 3 are at or below the 20-mill floor, where H.B. 920's reduction factors stop operating and a reappraisal raises revenue again.

Who gained, who lost

On total state support from FY2025 to FY2027, 2 of the 3 districts here rose and 1 fell. Every district here in the three years, on the measure selected. FY2025 is the department's final payment report; FY2026 and FY2027 are its models of those years, not payments. Changes are percentages of each district's own earlier year, so a city and a village read on one scale. Every figure is in nominal dollars.

FY2025 paid, FY2026 and FY2027 models

On total state support:

  • FY2025 to FY2026: of 3, 3 rose, 0 fell.
  • FY2026 to FY2027: of 3, 2 rose, 1 fell. Only Meigs Local fell.
  • FY2025 to FY2027: of 3, 2 rose, 1 fell. Only Meigs Local fell.
Southern LocalEastern LocalMeigs Local+7.1%0.0%
Southern LocalEastern LocalMeigs Local+7.1%0.0%
Southern LocalEastern LocalMeigs Local+7.1%0.0%
The values
  • Southern Local: +7.1% (+$534,526) in total state support, FY2025 to FY2027
  • Eastern Local: +4.8% (+$386,876) in total state support, FY2025 to FY2027
  • Meigs Local: 0.0% (−$128) in total state support, FY2025 to FY2027
Southern Local $7,540,841$7,949,377$8,075,366 +5.4%
+$408,536
+1.6%
+$125,989
+7.1%
+$534,526
61.7% 58.0% Foundation aid
+$531,646
Eastern Local $8,127,131$8,240,014$8,514,007 +1.4%
+$112,883
+3.3%
+$273,993
+4.8%
+$386,876
59.9% 58.2% Foundation aid
+$373,412
Meigs Local $18,231,682$18,563,755$18,231,555 +1.8%
+$332,073
−1.8%
−$332,200
0.0%
−$128
70.6% 68.4% Base funding supplement
+$57,069

On foundation aid:

  • FY2025 to FY2026: of 3, 3 rose, 0 fell.
  • FY2026 to FY2027: of 3, 2 rose, 1 fell. Only Meigs Local fell.
  • FY2025 to FY2027: of 3, 2 rose, 1 fell. Only Meigs Local fell.
Southern LocalEastern LocalMeigs Local+7.5%−0.2%
Southern LocalEastern LocalMeigs Local+7.5%−0.2%
Southern LocalEastern LocalMeigs Local+7.5%−0.2%
The values
  • Southern Local: +7.5% (+$531,646) in foundation aid, FY2025 to FY2027
  • Eastern Local: +4.9% (+$373,412) in foundation aid, FY2025 to FY2027
  • Meigs Local: −0.2% (−$27,489) in foundation aid, FY2025 to FY2027
Southern Local $7,107,463$7,494,303$7,639,109 +5.4%
+$386,840
+1.9%
+$144,806
+7.5%
+$531,646
61.7% 58.0%
Eastern Local $7,558,552$7,644,091$7,931,963 +1.1%
+$85,539
+3.8%
+$287,872
+4.9%
+$373,412
59.9% 58.2%
Meigs Local $16,143,791$16,351,757$16,116,302 +1.3%
+$207,966
−1.4%
−$235,454
−0.2%
−$27,489
70.6% 68.4%

The two measures can disagree in sign. Total state support is every line the department pays a district through; foundation aid is core foundation funding and the guarantee alone, and a district held at its base does not move on it whatever its other lines do. Each district's name opens its change tab, which splits its own figures by line.

State share, from FY2026 to FY2027, falls in every district here. It is the part of base cost the state pays after a district's local capacity is charged, so it reaches the dollars through foundation aid; the FY2025 payment report does not publish it.

The same steps for every district in Ohio, one provision at a time — the supplement H.B. 96 repealed, the new count in DPIA, reappraisal through local capacity and the phase-in — are on What changed.

A district whose territory crosses a county line is filed under the one county the department assigns it, so it appears on that county's page and on no other.