Places › Counties
Greene County
7 districts · 19,793 pupils · 5 on the guarantee · 1 at the 20-mill floor · richest 1.5× the poorest
All 88 counties, ordered by that ratio. The median Ohio district receives $5,910 per pupil in state aid in FY2027.
The spread inside Greene County
Yellow Springs Exempted Village stands on 1.5× Fairborn City's tax base per pupil: $362,306 against $246,325. Every district in the county by the assessed valuation each of its pupils stands on — one dot each, poorest on the left.
The values
- Fairborn City: $246,325 per pupil, $5,258 state aid per pupil
- Greeneview Local: $267,574 per pupil, $4,261 state aid per pupil
- Cedar Cliff Local: $290,066 per pupil, $6,900 state aid per pupil
- Xenia Community City: $302,563 per pupil, $4,718 state aid per pupil
- Bellbrook-Sugarcreek Local: $343,386 per pupil, $2,039 state aid per pupil
- Beavercreek City: $359,082 per pupil, $1,232 state aid per pupil
- Yellow Springs Exempted Village: $362,306 per pupil, $3,772 state aid per pupil
| District | Valuation per pupil | State aid per pupil | Pupils |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yellow Springs Exempted Village The most property wealth per pupil here |
$362,306 | $3,772 | 588 |
| Fairborn City The least |
$246,325 | $5,258 | 3,971 |
These four figures are the headline; the full comparison puts the two side by side on every measure the panel carries.
Where that sits among the 84 counties with more than one district reporting a tax base — one dot each, narrowest on the left, and the rule marked Greene is this county. The median is 2.1× apart.
The values
- Adams: 1.1× between its richest and poorest district
- Carroll: 1.2× between its richest and poorest district
- Auglaize: 1.2× between its richest and poorest district
- Harrison: 1.2× between its richest and poorest district
- Morrow: 1.3× between its richest and poorest district
- Jackson: 1.3× between its richest and poorest district
- Meigs: 1.4× between its richest and poorest district
- Van Wert: 1.4× between its richest and poorest district
- Preble: 1.4× between its richest and poorest district
- Paulding: 1.5× between its richest and poorest district
- Greene: 1.5× between its richest and poorest district
- Champaign: 1.5× between its richest and poorest district
- Huron: 1.5× between its richest and poorest district
- Highland: 1.5× between its richest and poorest district
- Mercer: 1.5× between its richest and poorest district
- Pike: 1.6× between its richest and poorest district
- Geauga: 1.6× between its richest and poorest district
- Madison: 1.6× between its richest and poorest district
- Putnam: 1.6× between its richest and poorest district
- Medina: 1.6× between its richest and poorest district
- Gallia: 1.7× between its richest and poorest district
- Holmes: 1.7× between its richest and poorest district
- Clinton: 1.7× between its richest and poorest district
- Pickaway: 1.7× between its richest and poorest district
- Union: 1.7× between its richest and poorest district
- Henry: 1.7× between its richest and poorest district
- Sandusky: 1.7× between its richest and poorest district
- Darke: 1.8× between its richest and poorest district
- Williams: 1.8× between its richest and poorest district
- Shelby: 1.8× between its richest and poorest district
- Guernsey: 1.8× between its richest and poorest district
- Perry: 1.8× between its richest and poorest district
- Ashtabula: 1.8× between its richest and poorest district
- Warren: 1.8× between its richest and poorest district
- Delaware: 1.9× between its richest and poorest district
- Fayette: 1.9× between its richest and poorest district
- Fulton: 2.0× between its richest and poorest district
- Scioto: 2.0× between its richest and poorest district
- Washington: 2.0× between its richest and poorest district
- Clermont: 2.0× between its richest and poorest district
- Hardin: 2.1× between its richest and poorest district
- Wood: 2.1× between its richest and poorest district
- Muskingum: 2.1× between its richest and poorest district
- Brown: 2.1× between its richest and poorest district
- Erie: 2.1× between its richest and poorest district
- Tuscarawas: 2.2× between its richest and poorest district
- Hancock: 2.3× between its richest and poorest district
- Coshocton: 2.3× between its richest and poorest district
- Clark: 2.3× between its richest and poorest district
- Wyandot: 2.3× between its richest and poorest district
- Richland: 2.4× between its richest and poorest district
- Ashland: 2.4× between its richest and poorest district
- Miami: 2.4× between its richest and poorest district
- Lawrence: 2.4× between its richest and poorest district
- Logan: 2.5× between its richest and poorest district
- Belmont: 2.5× between its richest and poorest district
- Knox: 2.5× between its richest and poorest district
- Lucas: 2.6× between its richest and poorest district
- Portage: 2.6× between its richest and poorest district
- Ross: 2.6× between its richest and poorest district
- Licking: 2.6× between its richest and poorest district
- Marion: 2.6× between its richest and poorest district
- Seneca: 2.7× between its richest and poorest district
- Wayne: 2.8× between its richest and poorest district
- Noble: 2.8× between its richest and poorest district
- Fairfield: 2.9× between its richest and poorest district
- Allen: 3.0× between its richest and poorest district
- Butler: 3.0× between its richest and poorest district
- Stark: 3.2× between its richest and poorest district
- Defiance: 3.2× between its richest and poorest district
- Summit: 3.3× between its richest and poorest district
- Columbiana: 3.5× between its richest and poorest district
- Athens: 3.8× between its richest and poorest district
- Franklin: 3.9× between its richest and poorest district
- Mahoning: 4.4× between its richest and poorest district
- Lorain: 4.7× between its richest and poorest district
- Lake: 4.7× between its richest and poorest district
- Crawford: 4.9× between its richest and poorest district
- Trumbull: 5.1× between its richest and poorest district
- Montgomery: 5.3× between its richest and poorest district
- Hamilton: 5.3× between its richest and poorest district
- Cuyahoga: 5.5× between its richest and poorest district
- Jefferson: 6.5× between its richest and poorest district
- Ottawa: 7.4× between its richest and poorest district
Two districts in the same county, 1.5 times apart on the tax base each pupil stands on — $115,981 per pupil of assessed valuation. Every mill Fairborn City levies raises 0.68 of what the same mill raises in Yellow Springs Exempted Village, which is the disparity DeRolph was brought over and the reason the formula has an equalization term at all.
The formula answers it here: Fairborn City receives $1,486 more state aid per pupil than Yellow Springs Exempted Village. Whether that closes the gap is a different question from whether it points the right way — $115,981 of valuation per pupil is not repaired by $1,486 of aid. Statewide, 294 districts are held above their formula amount.
7 districts
| District | Pupils | Valuation per pupil, FY2024 | State aid per pupil | Spending per pupil, FY2024 | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beavercreek City | 7,527 | $359,082 | $1,232 | $14,200 | on the guarantee · at the minimum state share |
| Bellbrook-Sugarcreek Local | 2,537 | $343,386 | $2,039 | $13,451 | on the guarantee · at the minimum state share |
| Cedar Cliff Local | 551 | $290,066 | $6,900 | $15,140 | on formula |
| Fairborn City | 3,971 | $246,325 | $5,258 | $15,259 | on formula |
| Greeneview Local | 1,247 | $267,574 | $4,261 | $13,562 | on the guarantee · at the 20-mill floor |
| Xenia Community City | 3,372 | $302,563 | $4,718 | $17,826 | on the guarantee |
| Yellow Springs Exempted Village | 588 | $362,306 | $3,772 | $18,678 | on the guarantee |
19,793 pupils across the districts listed, and that is a sum of these districts rather than a count of the county's children — Ohio school district boundaries cross county lines, so some of these pupils live elsewhere and some of the county's live in districts on another page. The department attributes each district to one county and this page inherits that attribution; it is a peer group, not a boundary.
Median state aid here is $4,261 per pupil, against $5,910 statewide. 5 of 7 are on the guarantee, against 48% of the state. 1 is at or below the 20-mill floor, where H.B. 920's reduction factors stop operating and a reappraisal raises revenue again.
Who gained, who lost
On total state support from FY2025 to FY2027, 4 of the 7 districts here rose and 3 fell. Every district here in the three years, on the measure selected. FY2025 is the department's final payment report; FY2026 and FY2027 are its models of those years, not payments. Changes are percentages of each district's own earlier year, so a city and a village read on one scale. Every figure is in nominal dollars.
On total state support:
- FY2025 to FY2026: of 7, 5 rose, 2 fell. The 2 that fell: Greeneview Local and Yellow Springs Exempted Village.
- FY2026 to FY2027: of 7, 2 rose, 5 fell. The 2 that rose: Beavercreek City and Bellbrook-Sugarcreek Local.
- FY2025 to FY2027: of 7, 4 rose, 3 fell. The 3 that fell: Fairborn City, Greeneview Local and Yellow Springs Exempted Village.
The values
- Beavercreek City: +14.8% (+$1,981,959) in total state support, FY2025 to FY2027
- Bellbrook-Sugarcreek Local: +7.5% (+$470,342) in total state support, FY2025 to FY2027
- Xenia Community City: +0.8% (+$167,612) in total state support, FY2025 to FY2027
- Cedar Cliff Local: +0.3% (+$10,645) in total state support, FY2025 to FY2027
- Fairborn City: −4.2% (−$1,067,328) in total state support, FY2025 to FY2027
- Greeneview Local: −8.9% (−$652,871) in total state support, FY2025 to FY2027
- Yellow Springs Exempted Village: −13.6% (−$391,145) in total state support, FY2025 to FY2027
| Beavercreek City | $13,383,395 | $14,754,715 | $15,365,354 | +10.2% +$1,371,320 | +4.1% +$610,639 | +14.8% +$1,981,959 |
10.0% | 10.0% the minimum |
Transportation +$878,403 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bellbrook-Sugarcreek Local | $6,311,745 | $6,750,635 | $6,782,087 | +7.0% +$438,890 | +0.5% +$31,452 | +7.5% +$470,342 |
10.0% | 10.0% the minimum |
Transportation +$161,238 |
| Xenia Community City | $20,399,098 | $20,625,054 | $20,566,710 | +1.1% +$225,956 | −0.3% −$58,344 | +0.8% +$167,612 |
31.1% | 23.8% | Foundation aid −$1,079,209 |
| Cedar Cliff Local | $4,111,156 | $4,169,470 | $4,121,801 | +1.4% +$58,314 | −1.1% −$47,669 | +0.3% +$10,645 |
40.7% | 34.9% | Foundation aid −$48,603 |
| Fairborn City | $25,185,879 | $25,498,144 | $24,118,551 | +1.2% +$312,265 | −5.4% −$1,379,593 | −4.2% −$1,067,328 |
41.6% | 36.0% | Foundation aid −$1,710,479 |
| Greeneview Local | $7,305,604 | $7,043,432 | $6,652,734 | −3.6% −$262,172 | −5.5% −$390,699 | −8.9% −$652,871 |
36.4% | 29.4% | Foundation aid −$891,433 |
| Yellow Springs Exempted Village | $2,875,386 | $2,544,200 | $2,484,242 | −11.5% −$331,186 | −2.4% −$59,958 | −13.6% −$391,145 |
19.0% | 11.9% | Foundation aid −$522,842 |
On foundation aid:
- FY2025 to FY2026: of 7, 0 rose, 5 fell, 2 did not move.
- FY2026 to FY2027: of 7, 0 rose, 4 fell, 3 did not move.
- FY2025 to FY2027: of 7, 0 rose, 5 fell, 2 did not move.
The values
- Beavercreek City: 0.0% ($0) in foundation aid, FY2025 to FY2027
- Bellbrook-Sugarcreek Local: 0.0% ($0) in foundation aid, FY2025 to FY2027
- Cedar Cliff Local: −1.3% (−$48,603) in foundation aid, FY2025 to FY2027
- Xenia Community City: −6.4% (−$1,079,209) in foundation aid, FY2025 to FY2027
- Fairborn City: −7.6% (−$1,710,479) in foundation aid, FY2025 to FY2027
- Greeneview Local: −14.4% (−$891,433) in foundation aid, FY2025 to FY2027
- Yellow Springs Exempted Village: −19.1% (−$522,842) in foundation aid, FY2025 to FY2027
| Beavercreek City | $9,274,783 | $9,274,783 | $9,274,783 | 0.0% $0 | 0.0% $0 | 0.0% $0 |
10.0% | 10.0% the minimum |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bellbrook-Sugarcreek Local | $5,173,421 | $5,173,421 | $5,173,421 | 0.0% $0 | 0.0% $0 | 0.0% $0 |
10.0% | 10.0% the minimum |
| Cedar Cliff Local | $3,853,151 | $3,851,122 | $3,804,548 | −0.1% −$2,030 | −1.2% −$46,573 | −1.3% −$48,603 |
40.7% | 34.9% |
| Xenia Community City | $16,987,814 | $15,908,605 | $15,908,605 | −6.4% −$1,079,209 | 0.0% $0 | −6.4% −$1,079,209 |
31.1% | 23.8% |
| Fairborn City | $22,588,758 | $22,369,578 | $20,878,279 | −1.0% −$219,180 | −6.7% −$1,491,299 | −7.6% −$1,710,479 |
41.6% | 36.0% |
| Greeneview Local | $6,206,928 | $5,788,699 | $5,315,495 | −6.7% −$418,229 | −8.2% −$473,205 | −14.4% −$891,433 |
36.4% | 29.4% |
| Yellow Springs Exempted Village | $2,741,731 | $2,336,543 | $2,218,889 | −14.8% −$405,188 | −5.0% −$117,654 | −19.1% −$522,842 |
19.0% | 11.9% |
The two measures can disagree in sign. Total state support is every line the department pays a district through; foundation aid is core foundation funding and the guarantee alone, and a district held at its base does not move on it whatever its other lines do. Each district's name opens its change tab, which splits its own figures by line.
State share, from FY2026 to FY2027, falls in 6 of the 7 districts here. Beavercreek City and Bellbrook-Sugarcreek Local are at the formula's minimum state share in FY2027. It is the part of base cost the state pays after a district's local capacity is charged, so it reaches the dollars through foundation aid; the FY2025 payment report does not publish it.
The same steps for every district in Ohio, one provision at a time — the supplement H.B. 96 repealed, the new count in DPIA, reappraisal through local capacity and the phase-in — are on What changed.
A district whose territory crosses a county line is filed under the one county the department assigns it, so it appears on that county's page and on no other.